At Alma 43:13-14, careful textual research eliminates a potential problem regarding population: According to the current printed text, the “descendants” of the priests of Noah were, somewhat improbably, “as numerous nearly as were the Nephites” altogether. However, in the original manuscript, Oliver Cowdery wrote “desenters,” which became “descendants” but should almost certainly read “dissenters.” In other words, by themselves the offspring of the priests of Noah didn’t almost equal the numbers of the Nephites. But their alliance with the Amlicites and the Zoramites did.
Intriguingly, too, Skousen (a specialist, be it remembered, in linguistics and the English language) contends that the language of the Book of Mormon isn’t Joseph Smith’s early 19th-century dialect, but English of the 1500s and 1600s. Indeed, certain elements of Book of Mormon vocabulary may derive from a period prior to the King James Bible — which is certainly something to ponder.
Sponsored by the Laura F. Willes Center for Book of Mormon Studies and the Harold B. Lee Library, the lectures will be held at 7 p.m. in the Gordon B. Hinckley Center on the BYU campus.
Daniel C. Peterson is a professor of Islamic studies and Arabic at BYU, where he also serves as editor in chief of the Middle Eastern Texts Initiative. He is the founder of MormonScholarsTestify.org, the general editor of “Interpreter."
- 'Tattooed Mormon' Al Fox shares her...
- Wright Words: Oklahoma tornado provides...
- Public invited to funeral services for Sister...
- 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah Scout...
- Woman told she would never walk, talk defies...
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet, passes away
- Amy Donaldson: LDS boxer B.J. Flores hopes...
- Tornado relief spurs LDS Church, Layton's...
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet,...
66 - Community of Christ recommends...
25 - Muslim leaders in U.S. facing...
23 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
19 - Supreme Court to weigh in on...
16 - Secretary of State John Kerry says...
14 - Hundreds of teens in Southern...
12 - 'Tattooed Mormon' Al Fox shares her...
8



I don't see anything strange in Peterson's article, but flatlander's comment seems quite odd. Peterson TELLS what Prof. Skousen is a specialist on: He's studied the textual history of the Book of Mormon and created a More..
@Craig,
A book as large as the Book of Mormon and with as many historical accounts, should be able to either be proven true through modern day scientific evidence, or thus proven false.
There really is no in between. If its More..
Apologists and debunkers have more in common than they suspect. One is out to prove, the other to disprove. Neither is the basis for honest scholarship.
To approach history with integrity, you can’t predetermine the outcome. An More..