Utah lawmakers received $96K in contributions from alcohol, tobacco companies
Governor opts to return money after Deseret News inquiry
Jeffrey D. Allred, Deseret News
SALT LAKE CITY — Gov. Gary Herbert is returning a $1,000 campaign contribution from the nation's second largest tobacco company, citing his pledge not to accept financial gifts from the alcohol and tobacco industries.
Herbert made the decision after the Deseret News inquired about the contribution from Reynolds American Inc., the parent company of cigarette manufacturer R.J. Reynolds, on his financial disclosure filed with the state Elections Office.
It is the second time the governor has returned a campaign contribution from a tobacco company. Herbert's campaign financial adviser said he was not aware the money for a table at his annual fundraiser, listed as coming from RAI, was connected to the tobacco industry.
Anheuser-Busch also reported a $1,000 contribution to the Herbert campaign, but campaign officials said it was never received. Liv Moffat, a financial adviser for the Herbert campaign, said the governor would adhere to his pledge and would return the contributions from Reynolds.
"The governor will continue to decline contributions from tobacco- and alcohol-related donors, including the donation from Reynolds," Moffat said. "The campaign has no record of a contribution from Anheuser-Busch, but the governor would return that donation under the same principle, as well."
Alcohol and tobacco companies poured more than $96,000 into campaigns for state offices in 2012, according to an analysis of the disclosures on file.
The contributors included beer manufacturer Anheuser-Busch, the Utah Beer Wholesalers Association and the National Beer Wholesalers Association, as well as the two largest tobacco manufactures in the country, Altria Client Services Inc., formerly Phillip Morris, and Reynolds American Inc.
In 2012, those alcohol companies gave a combined $37,850 to Utah candidates and political action committees, while the tobacco companies gave $58,200.
In addition to Herbert, alcohol and tobacco companies contributed to recently elected Attorney General John Swallow, as well as nearly every member of Utah's House and Senate leadership.
Quin Monson, director of BYU's Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy, said voters should pay close attention to where campaign contributions from alcohol and tobacco companies are going.
"Who you are willing to take money from does say something about who you are," Monson said. "Ultimately, the public is responsible for allowing legislators to do what they do, but that doesn't absolve legislators from any responsibility. You do face a choice of whom to accept money from and of how to fund your campaign."
Monson said it's not clear how much influence the companies are buying with their contributions, but that they're targeting the right people.
"In the campaign finance world in general, it's extremely difficult to prove what contributions actually get the donor. It's safe to assume, at a minimum, however, they get the donor some level of access," he said. "The way that these are targeted to leaders of the majority party shows they know what they're doing. They know where the power is, and they know who controls what comes up for votes in the Legislature."
Former Senate President John Valentine, R-Orem, who champions most of the alcohol legislation on the hill, received $750 from Anheuser-Busch and $500 from the Utah Beer Wholesalers Association.
Valentine explained why alcohol lobbyists presumably contributed to his campaign.
"There are a number of stakeholders in the alcohol policy debate, and some of them are the manufacturers," he said. "I try to be even-handed and look at both sides of the issue, and I assume they would rather have someone who will look at both sides, rather than someone who is one-sided."