Rich and Happie Larson at home with their kids Wednesday, July 11, 2012. The Larsen's have been foster parents for nearly 26 years and have 15 adopted children. Russia joined a growing number of countries that have banned adoption of children by American families. Some suggest that adoptions of children in the domestic foster care system will increase as a result.
Scott G Winterton, Deseret News
Just before Christmas President Vladimir V. Putin signed a bill banning the adoption of Russian children by American citizens, according to the New York Times. From their report: The decision is a "serious blow to an already strained diplomatic relationship. But for hundreds of Americans enmeshed in the costly, complicated adoption process, the impact was deeply personal."
It's become a familiar story in the world of international adoption, reports NPR. Nations that have traditionally sent the most children to the United States — including South Korea, China and Guatemala — have all scaled back, and in some cases ended their foreign adoption programs entirely.
Figures from the State Department show that the number of foreign children adopted by American parents has decreased by 62 percent in the last 10 years, from a high of 22,990 children in 2004 to just 8,668 children in 2012, reported the Chicago Tribune.
International adoptions have dropped steadily for two major reasons, according to Jasmine Budak in an article for the Canadian news magazine The Walrus. First, their are fewer children available for foreign adoptions because the rising middle classes in countries like India and China are adopting children. As domestic adoptions increase, their are fewer children available to families in the West. A second reason international adoptions have decreased is that countries are engaged in efforts to clean up an industry plagued by corruption.
And while the flow of foreign infants continues to diminish, the domestic public system may be in a unique position to fill the gap, or at least to take advantage and divert more hopeful parents to the thousands of kids in foster homes, wrote Budak.
“Because the supply of infants has dropped dramatically, childless couples find themselves going for what’s left: the kids who are at risk,” said University of Guelph psychology professor Michael Grand in an interview with Budak. “These are not the kids who have been traditionally chosen first.”
- Abercrombie & Fitch CEO posts statement on...
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
- Tornado relief spurs LDS Church, Layton's...
- Brave woman tried to reason with London...
- One block: How neighbors saw twister's deadly...
- IRS role in Obamacare adds deeper layer to...
- Authorities: Man questioned in Boston bombing...
- Photo gallery: Tornado rips Oklahoma suburb
- Mitt Romney talks IRS, AP records,...
65 - Journalists criticize Obama...
38 - Defending the Faith: A case for the...
24 - Associated Press CEO calls records...
23 - White House insists Obama was not...
22 - Former IRS chief to Congress: Can't say...
21 - IRS official Lerner invokes Fifth...
21 - More Obama aides knew IRS targeted...
19



[“Because the supply of infants has dropped dramatically, childless couples find themselves going for what’s left: the kids who are at risk,” said University of Guelph psychology professor Michael Grand in an interview with Budak. More..
Supply of children? Adoption is about finding a family for a child without attachment to parents or relatives. Not about childless couples. And you can have bio children and still be eligible to adopt depending on how many kids are in the home.
More..