Incoming payroll taxes only cover 79 percent of the benefit, which means families' monthly checks will decrease by 21 percent, according to an article in Bloomberg Businessweek.
shutterstock.com
WASHINGTON — The pot of money the Social Security Administration uses to cover disability insurance is projected to run dry in 2016. This means that the more than 9 million out of work disabled Americans, plus their spouses and children, who also qualify will see their benefits shrink considerably. Incoming payroll taxes only cover 79 percent of the benefit, which means families' monthly checks will decrease by 21 percent, according to an article in Bloomberg Businessweek.
America is in this situation, according to a report by the Congressional Budget office, because since the program's inception the amount of money paid out in benefits has increased nine-fold, while money put into the program has only increased five times. Part of the reason more benefits are being paid out is that the percentage of Americans applying for the program has dramatically increased. In 1970, about 1.3 percent of working-age adults — individuals ages 20 to 64 — were receiving DI worker benefits. In 2011, that fraction was 4.5 percent. At least some of this increase is due to more women entering the workforce, according to the report, although it doesn't account for all of it.
As the Social Security Disability Insurance caseload has grown, the employment rate of disabled workers fell by one-half. This occurred despite the fact that the Americans with Disabilities Act created new employment protections for disabled workers, jobs became less physically demanding and the health of the working-age population remained stable, according to a September 2012 report by the RAND Corporation.
In its report, RAND researchers argue that the structure of the SSDI program is a major force behind the decline in employment and accompanying program growth. In the mid-1980's there was an expansion in program eligibility — this combined with a rising benefit-to-earnings replacement rate made going on social security benefits a more attractive option than working.
RAND argues that recipients of benefits who are on the margin, meaning they could accept benefits or work because their disability is not severe, actually would be better off if they worked. RAND suggests that "marginal" applicants account for 23 percent of total applicants for disability insurance. Persons with marginal disabilities would earn $3,800 to $4,600 more per year on average in the absence of SSDI benefit receipts than in the present system.
- Kennecott lays off roughly 100 workers Thursday
- Utah ranks No. 1 for economic outlook for...
- US companies challenging contraception mandate
- 'Mantiques' could be a ticket to more cash
- The future of food? 3D printing moves beyond...
- S.L. draws up airport plans
- XanGo seeks ouster of co-founder in new lawsuit
- Couples registry gets preliminary nod from...
- S.L. draws up airport plans
33 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
29 - Should we let wunderkinds drop out of...
13 - Obama opposes GOP bill on Keystone XL...
11 - IRS official to take the 5th at hearing
8 - Apple's Cook to face Senate questions...
6 - The future of food? 3D printing moves...
6 - Obama threatens veto of Republican...
6



I'm sure no one would suggest that this trouble could possibly be a result of the 'gifts' made by Democrats in order to receive votes. And the upcoming solution to this problem will be yet another tax increase and another department More..
"The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money to spend."
Social Security (the basic program, not the disability program) is nothing but a Ponzi scheme and it is proven to be unsustainable. More..
One question, when did obesity become a handicap and a disability? There are millions on disability because they are super fat and have the health related problems that come with obesity. Instead of giving these people a wheelchair and money to stay More..