'You got away with murder,' judge tells Roberto Roman, acquitted of killing Millard Co. sheriff's deputy
"(Josie) didn't really trust the justice system," he said. "You don't need to let her down. … You've got one more decision. I hope you make the right one because he doesn't deserve to get out at all."
Assistant Attorney General Patrick Nolan outlined Roman's history for the judge, noting that Roman was arrested for a DUI at age 18, had been charged with a felony by age 20 and was ordered to prison by the time he was 25 for drug- and gun-related charges. He also said Roman has a history of avoiding accountability for his crimes.
"Fifteen years have passed, and look where we are," Nolan said. "Drugs and guns got us here. Drugs and guns have led to the deaths of two people in Millard County. … He continues to blame other people. … Never yet has he taken responsibility for any of his conduct."
Defense attorney Steve McCaughey asked that Eyre sentence his client to concurrent sentences. McCaughey took issue with the consecutive recommendation in a presentence report that, at one point, questioned why Roman never talked with police and told them his version of events.
"As his attorneys, we told him not to talk to police," the attorney said, before asking Eyre to consider the nearly three years Roman has spent in custody already. "He's done three years of hard time. That ought to be considered by the court."
But Eyre said he felt Roman's criminal history, "the severity of the crimes" and "the gravity of the surrounding circumstances" warranted consecutive sentences.
McCaughey said after the hearing that the sentence was one he had expected. He also said he advised Roman against speaking at the hearing due to possible federal charges.
"That's enough for me to tell him not to say anything," McCaughey said. "We expected (the sentence). We told him going in he'd be getting consecutive sentences."
McCaughey said an appeal is planned and that the judge's comment about Roman getting away with murder could come up.
"He could have said it differently, I think," he said.
Millard County Sheriff Robert Dekker said he agrees completely with the judge.
"I believe (Roman) got away with murder, and that's upsetting because the very system deputy Fox died protecting failed her in this particular case," the sheriff said. "But it's still a great nation. It's still a great system. It doesn't always work right, and that is what happened in this case."
Dekker said he was happy with the sentence but that those who knew and loved Fox will continue to struggle with her death and what happened in the trial.
"This was a great and terrible loss," he said. "It affects (Fox's family) forever, as it does all of us."
E-mail: emorgan@desnews.com
Twitter: DNewsCrimeTeam
- Bear scare: 'Baden and Logan saved my life.'
- Ryan Teeples: BYU sports is for BYUtv, not...
- 7-year-old girl who met Justin Bieber passes...
- Impeachment investigation 'highly likely,'...
- Miss Utah USA gets second chance at question...
- Attorney General John Swallow tells House...
- Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running shoe...
- Unlicensed midwife charged in death of Moab...
- Miss Utah USA's bungled interview...
38 - BYU poll: Majority favor impeachment,...
30 - Video: Miss Utah USA flubs answer at...
26 - 2 others back up extortion claims...
21 - Miss Utah USA gets second chance at...
21 - Attorneys for AG John Swallow say...
20 - Gunman caught after shooting...
20 - Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running...
20



Hey Joe, juries do stupid things (OJ). Just because a jury aquitted him doesn't mean he isn't guilty. Judges give their opinions all the time. I guess you have never paid attention to a Supreme Court decision. They are all opinions and More..
The judge knows full well that the defendant got out of the conviction on a technicality. If the victim's brother hadn't died and could testify about the defendant killing the victim, the outcome would be different. The judge was More..
Flashback.
As a very strong rule - and perhaps you did not know this - Appellate Judges (Which include the Supreme Court) do NOT over turn facts as decided by a jury they only over turn the rulings of law as decided by the Judge.
More..