4th Congressional District candidates Rep. Jim Matheson and Saratoga Springs Mayor Mia Love participate in a debate on KSL 5 News in Salt Lake City on Thursday, Sept. 27, 2012.
Laura Seitz, Deseret News
SALT LAKE CITY — Standing along side mothers of autistic children, Rep. Jim Matheson said Wednesday that Mia Love wants to eliminate federal funding for special education.
"In America, everybody gets a chance. That's the deal," he said. "Congress saw that in the 1970s and now my opponent wants to take that away."
Love reacted angrily to that assertion, saying she's never seen him this desperate and that he's trying to scare people.
"I think Jim Matheson should be ashamed of himself and his lack of leadership, that he would take these kids and use them for his own political gain. I want to be very clear here. I believe we have an obligation to care for those who cannot care for themselves," she said.
The six-term Democratic congressman said Utah schools, including 19 in the 4th Congressional District, currently receive $104 million through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which Congress passed in 1975.
"Each school would lose if my opponent has her way," Matheson said at a news conference at the Carmen B. Pingree School for Children with Autism.
Matheson bases his claim about Love from comments she has made throughout the campaign about wanting to do away with the U.S. Department of Education. The department administers special education dollars.
"It does not mean that," Love said.
Matheson, she said, "takes things and totally distorts them." Love said she wants to eliminate federal inefficiencies and give more control to states.
"We are going to take care of those children that cannot care for themselves and need that help," she said. "But the difference between Jim Matheson and myself is that he believes that federal bureaucrats are smarter and do a better job than our own local teachers, our own local families here in the state of Utah."
Matheson called that a "naive" position.
"Quite frankly, I don't see a lot of extra resources sitting around Utah right now in the education system," he said. "To suggest that we can just pull the plug on this at the federal level and somehow it's all going to work out, doesn't reflect reality."
E-mail: romboy@desnews.com
Twitter: dennisromboy
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments
Dennis Romboy is a reporter for Deseret News where for the past 20 years he has covered a variety of beats including state and local government, human services and the 2002 Olympics. He spent six years as a special more ..
- Ryan Teeples: BYU sports is for BYUtv, not...
- Bear scare: 'Baden and Logan saved my life.'
- Lehi imposes emergency watering restrictions
- Attorney General John Swallow tells House...
- 7-year-old girl who met Justin Bieber passes...
- Impeachment investigation 'highly likely,'...
- Unlicensed midwife charged in death of Moab...
- Miss Utah USA gets second chance at question...
Subscribe
Mobile
RSS
This issue highlights the Federal versus State debate. The States, for the most part, must be fiscally responsible; i.e. no deficit spending.
The Federal government has no such restrictions and everyone has this insatiable appetite for More..
Love put out a fairly specific proposal to cut federal spending that included eliminating all federal education subsidies. A more detailed proposal by The Cato Institute, on which Love’s plan was based, specifically called for eliminating More..
What's sad is that Mia is acting like mitt, and just claiming that's not what I meant when I said exactly that on camera?
Pathetic victim thing you republicans got going, Oh we're picked on because you caught us lying.
More..