Utah immigration law still on hold despite U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Arizona case
The attorney general said he disagrees with some in the Latino community who say the court has allowed racial profiling.
"I hope that they don't continue to inflame the public in that regard because it's not what it's saying. I do believe the message to Hispanics, in particular in states that allow this, is that they're going to be concerned, they're going to be stopped, they're going to be asked for their papers."
Utah and Arizona laws differ in the verification procedure. Arizona police are required to ask for documentation upon making a stop whether it be for a broken taillight or a DUI. In Utah, police would check status based only on a probable cause arrest for felonies or serious misdemeanors.
Shurtleff said the Supreme Court ruling "confirms that the Utah legislators did something different, that they really tried to avoid the major problems that were seen in the Arizona law that in fact were struck down."
Still, attorney and Latino community activist Mark Alvarez said undocumented immigrants in Utah have reason to worry.
"People who are driving are going to feel some anxiety, feel some fears, particularly going to Arizona. That's wrong. We live in an open society," he said.
The Rev. Steve Klemz, pastor of Zion Evangelical Lutheran Church, said the ruling leaves open racial profiling, which "sows the seeds of fear in the community. We cannot build community on fear. We cannot build community when racial profiling opens the way that a mother or father can be detained and possibly removed."
Even though the Supreme Court did not throw out the Arizona provision requiring police to check the immigration status of someone they suspect is in the United States illegally, the justices said the provision could be subject to additional legal challenges.
And Shurtleff anticipates that will be the case. "There's going to be much more litigation on this," he said.
U.S. Supreme Court ruling: Arizona v. United States
Related: High court rejects part of Arizona immigration law
Related: SCOTUSblog
Contributing: Associated Press
E-mail: romboy@desnews.com
Twitter: dennisromboy
- Davis County honor student arrested in deaths...
- Letters to family show Steven Powell still...
- Steven Powell can't go back to his home,...
- Man charged with killing Ogden officer found...
- Josh Powell made 'admission of guilt' in...
- Police locate West Point teen called 'person...
- Stump the Smith: Can you answer the questions...
- One third of millenials regret going to college
- Chaffetz not willing to take...
65 - Mia Love announces she's officially...
43 - S.L. draws up airport plans
33 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
29 - XanGo co-founder accuses partners of...
24 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
23 - Search for Susan Cox Powell is over,...
21 - Gov. Gary Herbert tells Washington...
17



Mandating e-verify, along with severe penalties for non-compliance would solve 95% of the problem.
But - sadly, employers in Utah don't want that, so it won't happen.
If Romney would simply make his position on illegal More..
@Fitness Freak:
"The illegal immigration problem IS best solved by the feds. but they're not doing it."
The federal government not upholding the law should give rise to impeachment. The feds can't arbitrarily More..
@Fitness Freak:
"But first, the Utah legislature needs to have the WILL to enforce. Something they haven't demonstrated so far."
Rob a bank law enforcement would be on your tail in a New York second with heavy More..