Community panel discusses removal of alternative family book from school libraries
Jamila Tharp, surrounded by her wife, Michelle Hasting and her children, Kaiden, Alexander and Abigail, (left to right) reads, "In Our Mothers' House," during a forum named, Community Stands up Northern Utah Addresses LGBT Bullying and Suicide.The panel raised concerns over removal of the book, "In Our Mothers' House," and it's the story of two homosexual women raising children in a "non- traditional household", in a Davis County Elementary School which placed the book "behind the counter," Monday, June 11, 2012, in Ogden, Utah.
Tom Smart, Deseret News
WASHINGTON TERRACE, Weber — Community members met Monday at the Pleasant Valley Branch for a panel on same-gender families and to discuss whether it's right to pull a book that deals with an alternative family structure from school library bookshelves.
The meeting, hosted by the OUTreach Resource Center, came a week after a Davis School District decision to pull "In Our Mothers' House" from its elementary school shelves. The book is still be available to students, but will be kept behind the checkout counter and will require a parent's permission slip to be checked out.
The book, by Patricia Polacco, tells the story of two women and their children. Davis School District spokesman Christopher Williams said the decision to remove the book from shelves came after a mother of a kindergartner who checked out the book objected to its subject matter. After a school committee decided to move the book to the third- to sixth-grade section of the library, the mother returned with 24 other parents to petition a review of the book. The decision was then made to store the book behind the counter and require parental consent.
"That way parents are in the driver seat," Williams said. "They can allow the student to read the book if they choose to."
But some parents see the decision as an overstep for a book that promotes tolerance of non-traditional families. Some said the caveat of a permission slip does not undue the fears of censorship.
"I just can't believe that they're still trying to ban books," Crystal Smith said. "I thought we were passed all that."
Smith said she trusts the discretion of a school librarian to decide if material is appropriate for an elementary-age student. From what she has heard about the book, she doesn't see anything wrong.
"We've known a family or two with those circumstances and I just act like it's a non-issue," she said. "If there's a question, they'll ask and I'll answer honestly."
Monday's panel included three same-gender couples who shared their experiences raising children in Utah's predominantly conservative community. Jamila Tharp and Michelle Hasting appeared with their children, and read from "In Our Mothers' House" to begin the panel.
"This family here looks a lot like our family," Tharp said, holding up a copy of the book.
After the reading, panel members commented on the normalcy of the story and Eric Amsel, chair of the Psychology Department at Weber State University, suggested that maybe the normalcy is what offends people.
"It was a story that makes normal the abnormal and maybe that's the problem," he said. "It normalizes gay life."
Amsel referred to state law, which makes it illegal for a public school curriculum to advocate a gay lifestyle. He said books like "In Our Mothers' House" do not classify as advocacy but instead defend gay lifestyles.
"It's defensive, not offensive and that is what's offensive to some," he said.
Hasting said the decision to remove the book from shelves leaves her concerned for students from both traditional and non-traditional families. She said it sends the message to children of a same-gender couple that their family is something that should be hidden and it blocks children of a heterosexual couple form learning about diversity.
"Imagine telling our children 'OK, go off to school now but don't talk about your family'," she said. "I Just think it's a loss for everybody."
Amsel said that both sides of the debate were motivated by a concern for their children and suggested that concern could potentially be used to bridge the gap and create a dialogue.
"We're here because we're worried about our kids," he said. "There's a foundation for some commonality there."
- Josh Powell made 'admission of guilt' in...
- Tornado relief spurs LDS Church, Layton's...
- Couples registry gets preliminary nod from...
- S.L. draws up airport plans
- XanGo seeks ouster of co-founder in new lawsuit
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet, passes away
- 2 Utah high schools ranked among the best in...
- 4 reasons why you need to paraglide at Point...
- Mia Love announces she's officially...
43 - S.L. draws up airport plans
32 - GOP delegates reject changes to...
31 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
28 - XanGo co-founder accuses partners of...
23 - Search for Susan Cox Powell is over,...
21 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
21 - Gov. Gary Herbert tells Washington...
17



George
Bronx, NY
There has been many people claiming censorship. My point is we censor the things kids can see and read all the time.
children should not be allowed in an R rated movie without their parents.
the book is More..
So, would it be ok for us to put harliquin romance novels in an elementary school library as well?
How about some pamplets on birth control?
This is an elementary school, the book is avaialble if the parents want to sign a permission More..
Local communities have every right to pick and choose, and protect the values of their community.
and you have every right to pick and choose what community you want to live in.
That is the beauty of America.
Live and More..