DRAPER — A handful of business owners joined the Utah Taxpayers Association Monday to oppose a $29 million bond to build a new recreation center.
But the Draper mayor and City Council responded by saying they won't be "bullied" by those who oppose the facility.
The owners are concerned about losing business, arguing that a new recreation center would have some of the same attractions that their businesses already have, such as water slides and access to fitness equipment. Since Salt Lake County has tentative plans to build a separate recreation center in the city by 2016, a Draper recreation center would require the residents to pay for two facilities, opponents say.
Royce Van Tassell, vice president of the Utah Taxpayers Association, said it's an issue of double taxation.
"The businesses that own these type of facilities (in Draper) have a pretty good read on what is going to affect their businesses and what is not," said Van Tassell. "We have heard very clearly that they are very nervous about it."
Shane Huish, the owner and general manager of Cowabunga Bay water park, and Anne Marie Christopulos, the general manager of Tree House Athletic Club, argued that Draper has enough parks and recreational facilities already and a new center would hurt their local businesses.
"This community can only support so many water parks and it does include every attraction that we have here," said Huish, referring to amenities at the proposed recreation center, including lazy rivers and water slides.
"And what's next? Movie theaters and food courts?" Huish asked.
Huish added that he would be fine with a regular recreation center, as long as it would not threaten his business. A traditional recreation center, he said, should only have a basketball court or a lap swimming pool and not attractions that would lure customers away from his park.
Christopulos noted that according to surveys, 62 percent of Draper residents already belong to an aquatic or fitness facility and the proposed recreation center would be built relatively close to her club.
The proposed facility would be city owned and operated and would be located east of City Hall in the Town Center Complex. Draper residents will be able to vote in the primary election June 26 whether to approve a $29 million bond to build the center.
"We believe now is the right time to do it and we believe this is what is best for our community," Mayor Darrell Smith said in a letter posted on the city's website. He said he and the City Council decided to push for the bond based on surveys that show residents want such facilities.
According to the city's website, the center would have about 140,000 square feet and will include an indoor sports field, a lap swimming pool, a family swimming area with lazy river and play equipment, walking/jogging track, racquetball courts, aerobic/exercise area, basketball/volleyball courts, a teen area, public multiuse meeting area and a child care area.
Van Tassell believes it makes no sense to have the bond elections in June because there is usually a significantly higher turnout in November's general election.
Draper City Councilman Jeff Stenquist said if the main concern businesses have is wanting the bond election moved to November, that is something that the council is already considering.
But Smith and the members of the Draper City Council issued a statement Monday saying they won't be "bullied" by those who oppose the center.
"The mayor and City Council are uniquely charged with understanding the needs of the community and its citizens. It would be irresponsible government for City Council to ignore these needs," the prepared statement says. "The City Council will take this important issue to the voters to decide and this city will not be bullied by special interest groups."
- S.L. draws up airport plans
- Should we let wunderkinds drop out of high...
- Couples registry gets preliminary nod from...
- 'Mantiques' could be a ticket to more cash
- XanGo seeks ouster of co-founder in new lawsuit
- Taking back family dinner: A healthy,...
- AIG CEO tells college graduates facing...
- Did you just win $590M? Get a good team in place
- S.L. draws up airport plans
30 - Writers offer personal finance advice...
30 - Should we let wunderkinds drop out of...
11 - Obama: 'Our focus cannot drift' from...
9 - Obama opposes GOP bill on Keystone XL...
7 - West Davis Corridor project unveiled...
6 - Airport TRAX ridership remains strong...
6 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
6



With our economy on life support is it really wise to burden the taxpayers in Draper with additional debt when many of them are stuggling just to keep their heads above water?
When money is tight it is prudent to prioritize our needs. Our More..
I take the opposite tack then the previous commenter. When the economy is in the tank is the best time to do something like this. Wages are low, building materials can be obtained at a much lower cost than when the economy is booming, and more More..
@John S. Harvey
That is the sort of logic that would lead a person to buy 50 pounds of bird seed just because it is on sale despite not even owning a bird. Just because current economic conditions might make it cheaper than it would be More..