In this May 8, 2012, photo, President Barack Obama speaks at the Asian Pacific American Institute for Congressional Studies dinner in Washington. Obama’s campaign is trying an "all of the above" strategy against Mitt Romney. It is criticizing the Republican’s character, wealth and policy positions in attacks that may become more focused as the fall election nears.
Carolyn Kaster, Associated Press
For months now, the conservative blogosphere has been calling out the White House for a campaign of distraction, squirrel chasing and the pursuit of shiny objects, as the White House seeks to talk about anything besides jobs.
Now New York Times columnist Ross Douthat has joined in, pointing out that Obama is wasting opportunities to drive Romney off the economic square by challenging his philosophy.
You can win news cycle after news cycle, Douthat argues, but still lose the war by not focusing on what voters are actually thinking.
"Obama is currently running for re-election as an opponent of sexism, homophobia and social reaction in all its forms. This is a decent strategy for winning news cycles, which the administration clearly did last week — playing the media brilliantly and watching as Romney was thrown on the defensive yet again," Douthat wrote.
"But Obama has won news cycle after news cycle this spring, and yet the president and his unloved, out-of-step-with-the-times challenger are almost dead even in the polls. That’s a sign that something isn’t working — and that this White House, not for the first time, has mistaken a clever strategy for a winning one."
Of course, more conservative bloggers agree.
"Could it be that the Obama campaign’s attempt to divert the race from economic news to social and cultural issues is actually hurting him with voters?" asked Alana Goldman at Commentary. "The Obama campaign has spent the past few weeks talking about everything from Romney’s dog to Osama bin Laden to gay marriage, while Romney has remained fairly focused on the economy. Maybe voters view distractions as a lack of seriousness on Obama’s part."
And at the Washington Post, Jennifer Rubin noted that Obama's polling on the economy is woeful: "Unless Obama can change that perception (by justifying his performance), enjoys an unexpected burst of economic good news (the reverse seems to be the case) or convince Americans that other issues are more important (very unlikely), that view is going to become more entrenched as time passes. In essence, Obama is trying to run out the clock when he is behind."
Eric Schulzke writes on national politics for the Deseret News. He can be contacted at eschulzke@desnews.com.
- Photo gallery: Tornado rips Oklahoma suburb
- Crews race to find survivors of Oklahoma...
- Journalists criticize Obama administration,...
- Top scandals and controversies of each United...
- Should we let wunderkinds drop out of high...
- Mile-wide tornado churns through Oklahoma...
- World War II munitions with mustard agent...
- Oklahoma, other tornado-hit states brace for...
- Mitt Romney talks IRS, AP records,...
65 - Journalists criticize Obama...
35 - Associated Press CEO calls records...
23 - White House insists Obama was not...
22 - House chairman sees IRS targeting as...
16 - Supreme Court to weigh in on...
15 - Tea party looks to take advantage of...
13 - More Obama aides knew IRS targeted...
13



here's a question - would you want Obama to run your company? Yes if today it was announced that Barack OBama would be your new CEO would you stand and cheer or start updating your resume? Obama has ZERO credibility on the economy and all his More..
Obama is strong on rhetoric and short on public policy that has anything meaningful to it regarding any class of people except those that expect the government to care for them from the cradle to the grave.
Most voters will see past this More..
@ DanO
The Republicans aren't in power. If they were you'd have never seen Obamacare pass. The Republicans are trying to get their power back. Now if those in power hadn't spent the country blind for generations yet More..