As the bureau works through the proposals and completes its analysis in the coming months, nothing is out of reach as it approaches the caretaking of the Colorado River much like a nutritionist might.
If the river is already anemic, does it make sense to cut away more precious acre-feet of water it needs to sustain what is already here? Or is it possible to build up the health of the river through massive conservation efforts, and bring in friends like the Mississippi, Snake or Bear rivers to conduct an intervention?
Massive, money-draining projects aren't out of the question if it means water still flows through the Colorado basin, but it depends on the price willing to be paid for water out of the tap, for a lifestyle in the arid West, for the desire to keep fields growing, Strong said.
"Some of these big pipeline systems will require you spend that kind of money to move water to where the people are," Strong said, "but a lot will depend on our appetite and foresight."
Related list: Dam locations that comprise the Colorado River Basin area
Read more: Lake Powell Pipeline: Albatross or golden goose?
E-mail: amyjoi@desnews.com
Twitter: amyjoi16
- Davis County honor student arrested in deaths...
- Man charged with killing Ogden officer found...
- Steven Powell can't go back to his home,...
- Letters to family show Steven Powell still...
- 2 from Provo killed in RV accident near St....
- Josh Powell made 'admission of guilt' in...
- Stump the Smith: Can you answer the questions...
- One third of millenials regret going to college
- Chaffetz not willing to take...
67 - Mia Love announces she's officially...
43 - S.L. draws up airport plans
33 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
29 - XanGo co-founder accuses partners of...
25 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
23 - Man charged with killing Ogden officer...
23 - Search for Susan Cox Powell is over,...
21



Before all these decisions are made, everyone needs real science on global warming, get rid of the hocus pocus and false reports and flat out lies which have been admitted by pro-global warming scientists and get some fact sactioned by both sides of More..
I would favor government policies that reward conservation now rather than wait until the need grows desperate.
Charge people the true cost of the water. Do not subsidize water for the west via Federal price breaks (i.e. from the pockets of We The People). Mississippi water would then be price-prohibitive.