Federal judge to hear DOJ's challenge to Utah's immigration enforcement law

Published: Thursday, Feb. 16 2012 2:58 p.m. MST

Utah Governor Gary Herbert signs a package of Immigration bills Tuesday, March 15, 2011 in the Gold room of the State Capitol.

Scott G. Winterton, Deseret News

Enlarge photo»

SALT LAKE CITY — Less than a year after Utah's immigration enforcement bill was signed into law in a formal ceremony in the state Capitol, a federal judge will decide whether to block HB497 from becoming law.

On Friday morning, U.S. District Judge Clark Waddoups is scheduled to hear arguments on a motion to keep HB497 from taking effect.

Attorneys representing the Department of Justice and a coalition of civil rights organizations have argued in court documents that the law is unconstitutional because it usurps the federal government's authority to set immigration policy.

Meanwhile, attorneys for the state of Utah have maintained the law is markedly different from other states' immigration laws that have been challenged by the federal government and HB497 should be allowed to go into effect.

Waddoups has also received requests from parties that have filed "friend of the court" briefs that want to address the court.

"We're eager to have this day arrive," said Karen McCreary, executive director of the ACLU of Utah.

"We've really been looking to have this opportunity to put forth the arguments we've been saying and writing about this kind of legislation."

Rep. Stephen Sandstrom, R-Orem, sponsor of HB497, said he plans to attend Friday's hearing.

"I think our law is completely different from other states" that have been challenged by the Department of Justice. "I actually do feel that we'll prevail in court."

Sandstrom said the Obama administration's decision to challenge Utah's law is "unfortunate."

When he and other Utah leaders met with DOJ officials in the fall, Justice Department lawyers said Utah's law was "the most reasonable, most measured approach they had seen of any of the enforcement bills to come out of the states." A few weeks later, the DOJ intervened in the lawsuit, originally filed as Utah Coalition of La Raza v. Herbert.

"They sued more to make a political statement than a matter of practicality," Sandstrom said.

Utah's law is unique from other states' immigration enforcement laws in the respect that it creates no mandates of the federal government.

Sandstrom said HB497 seeks joint efforts between the federal government and state of Utah to enforce existing federal immigration law, no different than the state working with federal agencies to enforce Drug Enforcement Administration laws or to police Internet pornography.

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS