A chip on the old card: Americans will soon see a new patch of technology on their familiar charge cards
Those replacement chip cards will still have magnetic stripes, so they can be used at stores or restaurants that don’t have chip-card readers. But at stores with chip readers, the cardholder will be directed to insert the card in a slot that can interact with the chip and will be prompted to provide either a personal identification number or a signature.
The Target breach, Vanderhoof said, made retailers wake up and realize that they need to move quickly to invest in chip-card readers.
“What wasn’t generally recognized before that was that retailers are vulnerable no matter what they do to try to harden their networks to prevent malware and criminals from breaking in and stealing their payment data” in a world when criminals can easily produce counterfeit magnetic-stripe cards with that data.
Secondly, Vanderhoof said, “Target unfortunately revealed that it is not just the risk of the cost associated with the loss of the cardholder data and the fines associated with that, it is also the reputational risk, the disruption of business.”
Target’s experience, he said, “made retailers aware that the cost of not doing something is much greater than it will be to make the investment to upgrade to EMV.”
Wal-Mart has had pay terminals that are capable of accepting chip cards, as well as magnetic-stripe cards, in its stores for about eight years. However, it is only beginning to activate the chip-reading functions this year as more chip cards go into circulation. About 4,000 of the company’s 5,000 U.S. stores have activated chip readers, and the rest of the stores will be operational before the end of this year, Wal-Mart spokesman Randy Hargrove said.
Wal-Mart also plans to issue a chip-embedded Wal-Mart credit card later this summer.
Hargrove said Wal-Mart’s international operations alerted the company early on about the need to prepare for the advent of chip cards.
“We recognized years ago that this is where we thought the technology was going, and so, we put the terminals in at that point,” he said.
Target announced in February that it was speeding up installation of chip-card readers in its approximately 1,800 stores and speeding up conversion of its Target REDcards to chip cards, with the transition scheduled to be complete in the first quarter next year.
Chip cards, like the current credit cards, require proof that the true owner of the card is using it. Current credit cards do that by requiring a signature, considered a weak form of identification.
Moving to a system of chip cards that require signatures, rather than PINs, would retain a weakness that currently promotes fraud, said Duncan of the National Retail Federation. The federation says that chip-and-PIN cards are the most secure technology, but it fears that card companies want to stay with signature verification because the larger ones have networks that are based on signature cards.
“Everyone knows that signatures are virtually worthless in terms of authenticating a card,” Duncan said, “and yet you have the big card networks, like Visa, wanting to issue new chip cards that are authenticated with a signature, rather than moving toward a PIN, as has happened in virtually every other place in the world.”
He added, “Visa and MasterCard are loath to give up signature, even though they know it is fraud-prone because they make more money, their banks make more money, and they’re hoping to pass the costs on to retailers and consumers.”
Magnetic-stripe cards with PINs would be a better alternative than chip cards with signature verification and can be used with existing PIN readers, Duncan said. Adopting a secure PIN and magnetic-stripe system would cost under $5 billion, compared with $30 billion to $35 billion for EMV readers, he said.
Some retailers are asking whether it would be wiser to spend $5 billion for a magnetic-stripe-and-PIN system and save the other $25 billion to $30 billion for investments in what is likely to be the payment system that makes credit cards obsolete — mobile payments.
“We’re reaching the point where the phone, which has a very powerful computer inside of it, could be used to provide a high level of security. So why don’t we spend that money on moving toward the day when we will have really secure, high-level mobile payments, rather than stretching out last-generation payment cards,” Duncan said.
The costs of chip conversion are not expected to be a problem for small retailers and restaurants with one card reader. Those readers usually are provided by the company that handles the payment transactions. But for retailers with hundreds of stores, a change in a card reader involves extensive retooling of its payment software and support systems.
©2014 The Record (Hackensack, N.J.)
Visit The Record (Hackensack, N.J.) at www.NorthJersey.com
Distributed by MCT Information Services
ILLUSTRATION (from MCT Illustration Bank, 202-383-6064):
- Balancing act: Survey: Office etiquette has...
- 3 ways insurers can still avoid covering the...
- All aboard: How to win the budget battle with...
- Dave Ramsey says: Government unlikely to take...
- How to eat on just $4 a day
- The faith-based investor: Making financial...
- Obama administration announces new compromise...
- 15 actions families are taking today to make...
- Obama administration announces new... 19
- How to eat on just $4 a day 16
- California push to avert higher gas... 10
- Mimicking the airlines, hotels get... 9
- Burger King in talks to buy Tim Hortons 7
- 3 ways insurers can still avoid... 4
- 10 things to know about corporate... 3
- All aboard: How to win the budget... 3