Town's regular moment of prayer is at the center of Supreme Court case

By Carolyn Thompson

Associated Press

Published: Saturday, March 29 2014 12:00 a.m. MDT

The two residents lost their suit in U.S. District Court after the judge found that the town did not intentionally exclude non-Christians and that the content of the prayer was not intended to proselytize or demean other faiths. But the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the practice of having one Christian prayer after another amounted to the town's endorsement of Christianity.

"We would like to see the practice of legislative prayer be inclusive of all traditions, whether that includes Muslims and Buddhists but also nontheists," Khan said.

In hearing the case in November, the judges raised various scenarios that included having officials review the content of prayers to make sure they are not sectarian or seeing that ministers are routinely advised of the diversity of the town board audience.

Justice Samuel Alito was doubtful about the residents' suggestion to eliminate explicit references to any religion, given the country's religious diversity. "I just don't see how it is possible to compose anything that you could call a prayer that is acceptable to all of these groups," he said.

Callahan, the sales rep, said that short of doing away with the prayer, the town board should not only honor requests from any religion — but also no religion.

"If someone says, 'I prefer one week we don't have a prayer,' don't have a prayer," he said.

Jerry Figliole, 68, said he's never felt forced to participate in the prayer at meetings he's attended. The audience and board stand for the Pledge of Allegiance and then sit while the prayer is offered.

"It's not like a service. It's very short," he said.

Try out the new DeseretNews.com design!
try beta learn more
Get The Deseret News Everywhere