Last of four articles exploring issues surrounding Common Core State Standards.
WASHINGTON — To say that new academic standards have yielded strange bedfellows would be an understatement.
Republican-on-Republican infighting? Teacher unions linking arms with tea partyers? President Barack Obama working in tandem with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and energy giant Exxon?
When it comes to Common Core, forget the old allegiances.
Traditionally Democratic-leaning groups don't like the standardized tests and are finding allies among small-government conservatives. The Obama administration wants more students leaving high school ready for college courses or their first jobs, a goal shared by big corporations.
"That wonderful old line (is) that the problem with national standards is: Republicans don't do 'national' and Democrats don't do 'standards,' " said Mitch Daniels, the president of Purdue University and former Republican governor of Indiana. "So the Common Core kind of gets it from both ends a little bit."
The standards, adopted by 45 states and the District of Columbia, essentially exchanged state-by-state benchmarks for one uniform guide about what skills a student should have at each grade level. For instance: all third-graders should know how to find the perimeter of a shape. How an educator at the front of a classroom teaches that is up to each school.
The goals were based on international standards and tests, which on Tuesday again showed American students lagging behind many of their peers. Supporters said the updated standards would help the United States regain its footing, better prepare high school graduates for college or their first jobs, and help the U.S. economy be more competitive.
But all of this was set in motion before the tea party rose to power. Once the small-government activists established a foothold in politics, they targeted the standards and forced lawmakers to choose between the business wing of the Republican Party and them.
Look at two potential contenders for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016.
Says Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal: "We need Louisiana standards, not Washington, D.C., standards."
Counters former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush: " you're comfortable with mediocrity, fine. I'm not."
Both see their education records as a political asset. Each has placed a bet on whether the standards keep enraging small-government activists or whether they fade by the time Iowa and New Hampshire start the nominating process.
Jindal's state adopted the standards in 2010 without much fanfare. But he faces growing opposition, with Stop Common Core Coalition of Louisiana lobbying against them.
"We support rigor and high academic standards that help ensure Louisiana students are getting the best possible education," he told reporters. "What we do not support is a national or federalized curriculum."
Common Core is not federal; it is not a curriculum. But Jindal isn't going to tell that to the activists because, if he makes a presidential run, he'll need their backing.
At the other end is Bush, the son of one president, the brother of another and perhaps a presidential candidate himself someday.
Jeb Bush has little patience with the criticism. "This should be above and beyond politics," he said.
But he acknowledges the strong opinions.
"This is a fight on the right. This is not a happy, little place where we're having a debating society. This is a fight. And not enough people are stepping up," he said at an education forum this fall.
- Lawmakers schooled on classroom technology
- Most American high schoolers don't know how...
- In our opinion: It's time to scrutinize...
- South Jordan councilman wants school district...
- Are Advanced Placement courses worth it?
- 'Horse' exhibit debuts at Natural History...
- Chess in the curriculum? The game that makes...
- Herbert on Common Core: 'We are going to...