Voter ID laws are said to discriminate against a class of people for whom it is considered a hardship to possess a valid form of personal identification. These people would typically be considered Democratic voters and these laws are therefore considered an attempt by Republicans to suppress them.
It is also easy to conclude that many of these same people are not in possession of medical insurance coverage. I find it ironic that these same people are now expected to have access to an Internet connection and navigate a complicated website that doesn't work. If they don't complete this task, they are in violation of the law and will be punished accordingly. Is it reasonable to expect them to complete the process of purchasing medical insurance through an exceptionally dysfunctional website on an Internet connection they probably don't even have? Yet, it is not reasonable to expect them to own a legitimate form of personal identification.
- Jay Evensen: Legislature's pornography...
- Jay Evensen: Ask people in the Third World if...
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe?
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment delusion
- Jonathan Johnson: The truth about sales tax...
- In our opinion: Critics of porn resolution...
- In our opinion: National security and the...
- Dan Liljenquist: Increasing police officer pay
- In our opinion: National security and... 77
- Is it time for our first woman president? 55
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms... 55
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe? 35
- Barack Obama: Religious freedom keeps... 33
- Jay Evensen: Legislature's pornography... 31
- Letter: Coal and job creation 23
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment... 19