Regarding Robert Samuelson's article (What is entitlement? Let's drop the label," Oct. 22), he's as confused as our friends in Washington, D.C., are. Social Security and Medicare are not entitlements. My employer and I have contributed 15 percent of my income before taxes since 1965. If you averaged only $30,000 over your working life, that's close to $220,500. Over 49 years of working at 5 percent simple interest, that's $892,919.98. If you took only 3 percent per year, you'd receive $26,787.60 per year and it would last better than 30 years.
What about congressional benefits — free health care, outrageous retirement packages, 67 paid holidays, 3 weeks paid vacation, unlimited paid sick days. Now that's what I call welfare, and you have the nerve to call my Social Security retirement entitlements.
Our retired seniors live on a fixed income with no aid and they receive no breaks, and yet we continue to feed billions in welfare to Haiti, Chile, Turkey, Pakistan, Iraq and Afghanistan. The folks in Washington all deserve a cell right next to Bernie Madoff. Shame on all of us if we elect just one incumbent next election. Their priorities are sure not mine.
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- Dan Liljenquist: The economic impact of...
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the...
- In our opinion: Federal contracting executive...
- My view: Utah's Constitution requires state...
- Perceptions of Obama and his policies at home...
- Capitalism and the common good: Fairness,...
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'?
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 114
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 79
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 47
- Join the discussion: Is feminism... 38
- Capitalism and the common good:... 37
- My view: A global warming solution to... 36
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the... 36