Excessive air pollution is, of course, undesirable. However, as Dr. Brian Moench has said ("Wood burning pollutes more than cars," Oct. 22), Salt Lake City and several other cities in Utah are in literal bowls surrounded by mountains; complete resolution of air quality problems is next to impossible. The problem with Moench, and others like him, is that they want to throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Perhaps what should be done is, during a temperature inversion, to move everyone somewhere else until a storm arrives to clean the air. We could hold our breaths; we could ban cigarette smoking; cars could be outlawed and no jet airplanes would be allowed to take off.
I sympathize with those who have breathing problems, but the rest of us cannot stop living because of them. I would hope that the medical treatments available would take care of at least most of the serious problems because what Moench and others like him would like to do is radically change our way of life.
It is fine to suggest using public transportation and carpooling, but to impose legal action to change our way of life would be criminal. Air pollution is a fact of life, especially during a temperature inversion. Somehow we need to live with it the best way we can.
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah...
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- Can Hollywood keep the faith in faith-based...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Re-enactment...
- Letter: Policy disagreement
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have voted for
- My view: Circuit Court's Obamacare decision...
- Letter: Outdated climate
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have... 69
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 64
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious... 61
- In our opinion: History will remember... 46
- Dan Liljenquist: Religious liberty and... 46
- Letter: Breeding hate 45
- Letter: Policy disagreement 37
- In our opinion: Use market forces and... 32