Excessive air pollution is, of course, undesirable. However, as Dr. Brian Moench has said ("Wood burning pollutes more than cars," Oct. 22), Salt Lake City and several other cities in Utah are in literal bowls surrounded by mountains; complete resolution of air quality problems is next to impossible. The problem with Moench, and others like him, is that they want to throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Perhaps what should be done is, during a temperature inversion, to move everyone somewhere else until a storm arrives to clean the air. We could hold our breaths; we could ban cigarette smoking; cars could be outlawed and no jet airplanes would be allowed to take off.
I sympathize with those who have breathing problems, but the rest of us cannot stop living because of them. I would hope that the medical treatments available would take care of at least most of the serious problems because what Moench and others like him would like to do is radically change our way of life.
It is fine to suggest using public transportation and carpooling, but to impose legal action to change our way of life would be criminal. Air pollution is a fact of life, especially during a temperature inversion. Somehow we need to live with it the best way we can.
- Letter: No labels in 2016?
- In our opinion: Research suggests that...
- John Florez: Businesses should help pay for...
- Letter: Our public lands
- Arthur Cyr: US presidential politics reflects...
- My view: The solution to Utah's water problems
- Dan Liljenquist: What we learned from the...
- My view: Your family stories have the power...
- Richard Davis: Do presidents have to be... 56
- My view: Get insurance out of health care 49
- My view: Obama's veto won't save Obamacare 35
- In our opinion: Attempting to... 32
- My view: 'Death with dignity' and... 27
- In our opinion: Concerned voters a good... 23
- John Hoffmire: Electric cars and the... 20
- Dan Liljenquist: What we learned from... 19