Letter: Sequestration victims

Published: Monday, July 22 2013 12:00 a.m. MDT

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel talks to soldiers and civilian workers about sequestration and civilian worker furloughs during a town hall meeting Monday, July 15, 2013, at Fort Bragg, N.C.

Andrew Craft, AP

Enlarge photo»

It's a little misleading to suggest that sequestration has been a victimless way to force the government to spend within its means ("Sequestration warnings sound a lot like crying wolf," July 15).

Thanks to sequestration, 60,000 homeless veterans are losing housing aid from HUD. More than 77,000 veterans have lost job training or military-to-civilian transition assistance from the Labor Department. Sequester layoffs at the Defense Department (where nearly half of civilian staff once served) means up to a 20 percent cut in pay for over 300,000 vets.

I support spending cuts, but not these blanket cuts that end up targeting the voiceless like homeless veterans and low-level DOD employees. Why doesn't Congress instead cut failing programs like the new F-35 fighter jet? The Pentagon plans to spend a whopping $12.6 billion every year buying F-35s from now until 2037, a staggering figure that doesn't even include ongoing sustainment expenses that even military leaders say are simply "unaffordable." Worse yet, experts say the F-35 maneuvers worse than bombers that got wiped out over Vietnam — hardly a ringing endorsement of its capabilities.

Surely we can move some funds from this gold-plated fighter jet to meet our obligations to veterans and their families.

Leroy Gallegos

Albuquerque, N.M.

Try out the new DeseretNews.com design!
try beta learn more
Get The Deseret News Everywhere