While I am both a devout Latter-day Saint and a registered Republican, I disagree with much of Pati Sorensen's July 3 letter ("Political correctness has gone too far").
There is always a legitimate argument to be made about whether society is becoming too politically correct. At the same time, however, legal fights over the display of religious monuments such as the Ten Commandments is, in my opinion, pointless and trivial. Our courts have ruled over and over again that government cannot endorse one religion or one set of beliefs over another, so to drag this issue up again and again actually does a disservice to the concept of freedom of religion. It implies that the right to worship God means believing in only a few specific ideas of God.
The argument I frequently hear is, "If the government has the power to take away religious monuments today, tomorrow they'll be taking away our churches and our Bibles."
Of course, there will always be those in our country who would love to see freedom of religion wiped away, but unless they gain enough power in the Congress and in the state legislatures to amend the U.S. Constitution, our chapels, cathedrals and books of worship are safe.
- 10 things you never knew about the FBI
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah...
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook for...
- Robert Bennett: Hamas and its financial...
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Re-enactment...
- Letter: Policy disagreement
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have voted for
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 109
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have... 72
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious... 61
- Dan Liljenquist: Religious liberty and... 52
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 46
- My view: Balancing personal conviction... 45
- Letter: Policy disagreement 45
- In our opinion: Use market forces and... 33