Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Both parties defend the caucus; is hope for reform lost?
Rick Bowmer, AP
Incredible as it may seem, other things are happening in politics beyond the trauma of Utah's attorney general and blockbuster U.S. Supreme Court decisions. A few worth addressing:
Utah Democrats, in their convention a week ago, defied some expectations and voted to maintain the caucus/convention nominating system. Does this hurt the effort behind the Count My Vote initiative to reform Utah's nomination process?
Pignanelli: "All men having power ought to be distrusted to a certain degree." — James Madison
Well it's settled. The only difference between Utah Republican and Democrat organizing conventions is the temperature of the caffeine they consume. Policy differences exist, but apparently a delegate is a delegate and will do anything to protect his/her influence to control the nomination process.
The Democrats exploded the opportunity to demonstrate they are enlightened citizens ready to undertake change for the betterment of the state. The result may impede future fundraising and support from moderates and independents who are tired of right-wing antics. Furthermore, mainstream Republicans were hoping to leverage a Democrat mandate for change with their activists. (Salt Lake County Mayor Ben McAdams deserves recognition of courage for his open advocacy of a primary system.) This is a significant setback for reform and guarantees that the delegate/convention system will remain in place for many years.
Webb: I greatly appreciate this opportunity to outrageously offend insiders/activists in both political parties. I'm a volunteer for the Count My Vote effort, so I obviously have strong opinions. By rejecting the views of moderates like McAdams, the Democratic Party demonstrated it is controlled by liberal labor unions, radical environmentalists and weird social justice activists — the left wing of the party. A mirror image of the Republican Party being controlled by right-wing arch-conservatives. Both parties have turned their backs on mainstream citizens, declining to broaden participation in the election process and discriminating against soldiers and missionaries who are away serving their country or church, or other people unable to attend party caucuses.
The Democrats could have emerged as the big-tent party of openness and inclusion. They could have said to centrist Utahns, "The Republicans don't want you. Come join our party." Instead, the same tired old liberal special interest groups continue to control the Democratic Party. Centrists aren't welcome.
Republican delegates, in their Central Committee meeting a week ago, endorsed an initiative called "My Vote Counts," designed to confuse Utahns who might support the Count My Vote reform effort. Is this dirty politics?
Pignanelli: When hundreds of Republicans forsake a beautiful Saturday to discuss political minutia, mischief is the result. Delegates and party officials believe their counter initiative is clever, but they risk backlash. Business and community leaders are already frustrated with the nasty right-wing Republican tone on immigration and other issues. Many long-time donors who keep the GOP offices open are considering diverting their resources from the party and towards candidates who reflect their views.
Count My Vote should drop the initiative and focus on precinct caucuses next March to ensure reasonable candidates and greater potential for change in 2015 organizing conventions.
Webb: The My Vote Counts diversionary tactic is dumb politics. It's going to cause great divisions within the Republican Party. It pits arch-conservative party insiders, who want to control the process and keep everyone else out, against mainstream Republican business and community leaders who want to open the process and encourage more participation.
- Jay Evensen: Open wide and swallow your tax...
- Natalie Gochnour: The best of Utah...
- Robert J. Samuelson: Net neutrality could...
- In our opinion: SB296 bridges...
- Dan Liljenquist: Looking to the Supreme Court...
- Letter: Why such controversy?
- In our opinion: Closing the 'discipline gap'...
- George F. Will: IRS continues to act in...
- Bob Bennett: Climate change question... 97
- Letter: Same stale air 48
- My view: Common Core tests erode... 42
- Letter: Mandated freedom 37
- In our opinion: SB296 bridges... 31
- Dan Liljenquist: Looking to the Supreme... 30
- In our opinion: Talking of tax reform... 28
- Letter: Who's against Healthy Utah? 28