Unfortunately, Michael Gerson's liberal attack on honest patriots is very suave and persuasive ("Issuing threats for political purposes only poisons patriotism," June 14). Is defending the Constitution "not recognizably conservative" as he claims? Is seeing danger before it arrives "noxious, dishonest and dishonorable"? And who is "questioning the legitimacy of our government"? No one.
Instead, we are — and should be — questioning and decrying the illegitimate exercise of authority by leaders within our government. Being alert to these abuses is not "breathless exaggeration" as Gerson claims, for the facts, human nature and history speak for themselves — eventually. Wind, ominous clouds and thunder should be acknowledged, Gerson, not denied.
- In our opinion: National security and the...
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms of...
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment delusion
- My view: hippies, 2 Hell's Angels, one...
- Jay Evensen: On Second Thought: The 1 percent...
- Is it time for our first woman president?
- My view: They run toward danger
- Barack Obama: Religious freedom keeps us strong
- In our opinion: National security and... 66
- Is it time for our first woman president? 55
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms... 42
- Letter: Hillary and FOIA 18
- Letter: No labels in 2016? 17
- In our opinion: The lesson of... 17
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment... 15
- Arthur Cyr: US presidential politics... 13