Linda Johnson wrote that vouchers would lead to abandonment of underfunded public schools for others, apparently a very bad thing because all other schools are religious and might teach their religious biases, along with neglecting science and rational thought ("Religious schools," June 2).
However, not all non-public schools are religious, and you don't even consider quasi-public schools — I attend a charter school where I receive an excellent education for less money than public school students. Also, what makes you believe public schools teach science and rational thought? Having attended public, private and charter schools, I can testify that public schooling teaches neither well.
As for being underfunded, we do more with less at my school. We don't have busy work and use less paper. We don't provide meals. We don't have sports — though our chess team hones its rational thinking skills and our Academic Decathlon team took third in the state.
We should provide options to public schooling, not pour money into a failing institution. If our system were opened to vouchers or free market competition, our graduates would be the most well-educated and economical in the country, prime human capital for industry or entrepreneurship. Now that sounds like success.
Rachel Darata, 17
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act needs...
- Doug Robinson: Violence against women is...
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'?
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- My view: Powdr Corp and Park City Mountain...
- Dan Liljenquist: The economic impact of...
- The relationship between religiosity and...
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 114
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 78
- My view: Balancing personal conviction... 53
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Letter: Policy disagreement 45
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 41
- My view: A global warming solution to... 36
- Join the discussion: Is it impossible... 33