Publishing information in your paper that seeks to attribute the MMR vaccine to autism is grossly irresponsible and destructive. The link stated by Cindy Pokezwinski in this piece is not based in scientific fact ("MMR vaccine caused my son's autism," May 23). The National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine — along with scientific, double-blinded research — conclusively proves there is no link between the two.
Giving airtime to this quackery only causes uneducated parents of children with autism to blame themselves, blame their doctors, engage in dangerous and unproven pseudo autism treatments (e.g., chelation) and, more importantly, it redirects energy and focus from finding the actual cause (and treatments). Your team should be ashamed of themselves for publishing this. It's akin to publishing an article stating the latest and greatest MLM product can cure cancer or stop the aging process.
New York City
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Our thoughts...
- 18 of the most heart warming and feel-good...
- Why LDS Church's anti-discrimination stance...
- What one word best describes Barack Obama?
- What The New York Times gets wrong about...
- In our opinion: Fairness for all: Religion...
- Letter: Slap to our history
- Drew Clark: The beams and motes of getting...
- What The New York Times gets wrong... 90
- In our opinion: Fix, don't repeal,... 74
- Michael and Jenet Erickson: Utah... 50
- In our opinion: Fairness for all:... 44
- Mike Lee: Tax reform shouldn't penalize... 38
- Why LDS Church's anti-discrimination... 38
- Jay Evensen: Will Obama visit Utah? Do... 37
- In our opinion: It's time for Utah to... 27