Scott G. Winterton, Scott G. Winterton, Deseret News
Rich McKeown, spokesman for Count My Vote (CMV) said, "We just think we can do better" ("GOP delegates reject changes to nominating system," May 18). A few people believe their ideas on how to improve the process private organizations use to select their representatives. Then when the groups don't agree, these ideas should be imposed on them by force of law.
If my friends and I don't like the process our church uses to select their leaders, should we organize and get the state to dictate to my church how leaders are selected? What if the ideas don't work or have unintended consequences? How easy will it be to adjust the laws? Right now different parties can have their own rules; multiple experiments can be run and rules quickly changed. For example, the Democrats reduced the threshold to win at convention from 70 percent to 60 percent in the '90s. The Republicans shortly followed.
CMV is willing to spend a lot of money ($1 million) in a campaign to have the state impose their ideas on all political parties. Why doesn't CMV spend money on research that supports its ideas and educate parties rather than threaten to expand the power of the state to control private organizations?
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- Dan Liljenquist: The economic impact of...
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the...
- In our opinion: Federal contracting executive...
- My view: Utah's Constitution requires state...
- Perceptions of Obama and his policies at home...
- Capitalism and the common good: Fairness,...
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'?
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 114
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 79
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 47
- Join the discussion: Is feminism... 38
- Capitalism and the common good:... 37
- My view: A global warming solution to... 36
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the... 36