Scott Garner's letter makes some excellent points as to why we should not support same-sex marriage ("Church and state," April 28). First, Garner argues that to do so we should marginalize religion in the public forum. That of course is the exact opposite of the Constitution's First Amendment, which was meant to protect religion from the effects of political interference.
Second, Garner argues that we should marginalize history by allowing an out-of-context statement from Thomas Jefferson to stand for Jefferson's philosophy on church-state relations. Actions speak louder than words. If Jefferson truly believed in a wall of separation, then why, as president of the United States, did he allow, support and even attend church services held in the U.S. Capitol building?
Michael D. Thorpe
- Jay Evensen: Legislature's pornography...
- Jay Evensen: Ask people in the Third World if...
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe?
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment delusion
- Jonathan Johnson: The truth about sales tax...
- In our opinion: Critics of porn resolution...
- In our opinion: National security and the...
- Dan Liljenquist: Increasing police officer pay
- In our opinion: National security and... 77
- Is it time for our first woman president? 55
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms... 55
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe? 35
- Barack Obama: Religious freedom keeps... 33
- Jay Evensen: Legislature's pornography... 31
- Letter: Coal and job creation 23
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment... 19