Scott Garner's letter makes some excellent points as to why we should not support same-sex marriage ("Church and state," April 28). First, Garner argues that to do so we should marginalize religion in the public forum. That of course is the exact opposite of the Constitution's First Amendment, which was meant to protect religion from the effects of political interference.
Second, Garner argues that we should marginalize history by allowing an out-of-context statement from Thomas Jefferson to stand for Jefferson's philosophy on church-state relations. Actions speak louder than words. If Jefferson truly believed in a wall of separation, then why, as president of the United States, did he allow, support and even attend church services held in the U.S. Capitol building?
Michael D. Thorpe
- 10 things you never knew about the FBI
- In our opinion: With Shurtleff and Swallow...
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah...
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- Helping kids master what matters: Emotions,...
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook for...
- Letter: Degrading literature
- Doug Robinson: Violence against women is...
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 112
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have... 74
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious... 62
- My view: Balancing personal conviction... 51
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 48
- Letter: Policy disagreement 45
- In our opinion: Use market forces and... 35
- The complicated political views of... 33