In reading Stan McQueen's letter, my attention was drawn to the last sentence "speculating about the motives" of environmental advocates who would destroy the economy in the name of preventing climate change ("Climate change facts," April 15). This feels like conspiracy theory. The environmentally conscious people with whom I've interacted have no vested interest in hurting the economy. They, like all, are negatively impacted when the economy is down. But maybe the economy isn't the only consideration.
What I find admirable about the environmental cause is a willingness to look beyond the immediate comforts of me and mine and to consider the world we're leaving for those who will follow. I guess if there is an environmental conspiracy, it would be people lending their voices to the animal and plant kingdoms and to generations unborn who really have no voice but whose well-being so heavily depends upon our practices, policies and decisions.
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet
- School fees: Is Utah really family friendly?
- Charles Krauthammer: Solution to inversion is...
- Jay Evensen: Utahns support Common Core, even...
- 20 of the most influential and innovative...
- Michael Gerson: State of Israel: History...
- Letter: Society puzzles
- Equality in family life does not mean sameness
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb:... 82
- Letter: Police brutality 62
- School fees: Is Utah really family... 48
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse... 43
- Richard Davis: The State Board can do... 42
- Constitutional commitments trump tribal... 35
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet 33
- Join the discussion: Is Common Core... 29