Carolyn Kaster, Associated Press
The supporters of gay marriage present it as a civil right and ask the question this way: Should gay people be allowed to marry? The corollary question is: How does it harm you if we allow gay people to marry?
The fundamental issues are not expressed. What the supporters really want is to apply all of the laws (1,000 plus) that govern traditional marriage between a man and a woman and apply them, across the board, to the concept of gay marriage. First of all, gay marriage between a man and another man is quite different from traditional marriage between a man and a woman. Gay marriage between a woman and another woman is quite different from gay marriage between a man and a man. Each situation would require a different set of laws that would govern each case.
These laws should be carefully thought out, researched and debated before they are signed into law. Most people have no idea what is contained in the 1,000 plus laws that govern traditional marriage. How can they be expected to vote intelligently on the issue? There are other questions that should be thought out carefully, researched and debated concerning gay marriage, divorce and adoption of children. Just making a blanket decision on this subject is ludicrous.
Blaine R. McCann
- Jay Evensen: Utahns support Common Core, even...
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse tends to...
- 20 of the most influential and innovative...
- In our opinion: Park City's slippery slopes
- Carmen Rasmusen Herbert: Lessons learned from...
- School fees: Is Utah really family friendly?
- Richard Davis: The State Board can do better...
- Letter: Criminalizing marijuana
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb:... 82
- Letter: Police brutality 62
- School fees: Is Utah really family... 47
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse... 43
- Richard Davis: The State Board can do... 41
- Constitutional commitments trump tribal... 34
- Robert J. Samuelson: Do Democrats do it... 28
- Letter: Teachers' perspective 28