Confused logic is apparent when John Florez conflates societal moral values and government functions ("Are we losing our sense of morals?" April 6). Charity is a pillar of Christian moral beliefs, but there is no constitutional basis for charitable functions with public monies. Additionally, equating personal moral values to obligated actions is specious except in the negative, such as "Thou Shalt Not Steal," etc.
To believe otherwise is to disregard the meticulous reasoning of our Founding Fathers, whose chief concern was prevention of tyranny by strict limitation of governmental power. To accept largess reduces citizens to supplicants, with outstretched hands, vying for our masters' attention. American greatness resulted from individual freedom, threatened today by government expansion, oft based on appeals "for the public good."
Fred L. Greer
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- Dan Liljenquist: The economic impact of...
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the...
- In our opinion: Federal contracting executive...
- Capitalism and the common good: Fairness,...
- My view: Utah's Constitution requires state...
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'?
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act needs...
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 114
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 79
- My view: Balancing personal conviction... 54
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 46
- Letter: Policy disagreement 45
- Join the discussion: Is feminism... 37
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the... 37