Scott G Winterton, Deseret News
In Canada, we, too, have air-quality problems, although nothing on the scale of Utah's. I just read the Utah Moms for Clean Air's plan for cleaner air and was impressed by how the plan immediately addressed the economic side of the clean-air equation. If it is inappropriate to dump our home sewage and garbage into the street, why should it not be equally inappropriate to dump toxins into air? The airshed, they rightfully claim, should not be a free public sewer — but under current law, that is exactly what it is.
The Airshed User Fee is also genius. People do not like taxes — and rightfully so — but people can get their head around the idea of paying for the proper handling of the garbage, as they already do once a week. Nothing seems to motivate businesses or personal behavior more than money, so the user fee will ask them to either pay the cost of polluting or find ways to do things cleaner, the latter of which will rightfully save businesses and consumers lots of money.
UMFCA hit the nail on the head. The moms should be proud of the plan they have produced — and so should everyone in the state of Utah.
Kamloops, BC, Canada
- Jay Evensen: Ask people in the Third World if...
- In our opinion: Alleged medicinal benefits of...
- My view: Medical marijuana: Google vs. PubMed
- My view: Does going to pot send the wrong...
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe?
- Rely on invisible hand?
- George F. Will: Break the dentists' hold on...
- Jay Evensen: Legislature's pornography...
- In our opinion: National security and... 79
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms... 58
- Is it time for our first woman president? 55
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe? 39
- Barack Obama: Religious freedom keeps... 33
- Jay Evensen: Legislature's pornography... 32
- In our opinion: Alleged medicinal... 31
- Letter: Coal and job creation 24