I object to the logic in the Deseret News editorial titled "Keep these barriers" (March 11). The writer correctly states that Utah has the lowest percentage of underage drinkers in the nation, as well as other statistics lauding the benefits of us being a teetotaling state. The piece then criticizes the state Legislature for choosing to "meddle with alcohol laws that have a proven track record of reducing underage drinking."
As a non-drinker, I have minimal knowledge of our state's complicated drinking laws. However, my belief is that our low alcohol use is almost entirely related to the high percentage of practicing LDS people in Utah who follow their church's health code proscribing using alcohol and other addictive substances. To assess the effect of our drinking laws, we need to compare a group of communities in Utah with those in a neighboring state, such as southern Idaho with a comparable active LDS population. I doubt there would be much difference.
I won't debate the methods used to market alcoholic beverages, but I suspect that mixing drinks in view of minor children is minimally effective while a child observing their parents consume alcohol has a significant influence.
E. J. Corry
- Jay Evensen: Utahns support Common Core, even...
- 20 of the most influential and innovative...
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse tends to...
- School fees: Is Utah really family friendly?
- Carmen Rasmusen Herbert: Lessons learned from...
- In our opinion: Park City's slippery slopes
- Letter: Criminalizing marijuana
- Constitutional commitments trump tribal...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb:... 82
- Letter: Police brutality 62
- School fees: Is Utah really family... 47
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse... 43
- Richard Davis: The State Board can do... 41
- Constitutional commitments trump tribal... 34
- Join the discussion: Is Common Core... 29
- Robert J. Samuelson: Do Democrats do it... 28