Keeping the silence
Federal judge tells attorneys to develop Johnson's gag order
Federally-indicted businessman Jeremy Johnson, right, walks from the Federal Courthouse with his attorneys following a hearing Tuesday, March 12, 2013, in Salt Lake City. A federal magistrate gave initial approval for a gag order against Johnson. During a hearing Tuesday afternoon, Magistrate Paul Warner ordered attorneys to finish a draft of a gag order by mid-April. The U.S. Attorney's Office asked that Johnson be muzzled after they say he used the media to question the integrity of their office. Johnson accused new Utah Attorney General John Swallow of being part of a bribery scheme. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer)
Associated Press
SALT LAKE CITY — A federal magistrate said Tuesday that he intends to issue a gag order against federally indicted businessman Jeremy Johnson.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul Warner told attorneys at the outset of a one-hour hearing that it's not a matter of if a gag order is needed — but rather working to create one that is narrowly focused and doesn't infringe on free speech rights.
Warner ordered attorneys from both sides to work together to finish a draft of a gag order by April 17.
The U.S. attorney's office asked that Johnson be formally muzzled after they say he used the media to "publicly besmirch the integrity" of their office. They allege in court documents that Johnson used a blog, website, Facebook page and Salt Lake media outlets to wrongly accuse the government and its prosecutors of misconduct.
Johnson is a St. George businessman facing 85 counts of fraud and money laundering. Federal prosecutors say Johnson's businesses used the Internet to fraudulently enroll millions of people in get-rich schemes by charging their credit cards without authorization. He was originally indicted nearly a year ago on three counts of fraud and money laundering. Johnson has maintained his innocence.
His public notoriety skyrocketed in recent months when he came out in the media and accused newly elected Utah Attorney General John Swallow of orchestrating a bribery scheme that would have derailed a federal investigation into his business practices.
Johnson was at the hearing in the federal courthouse in Salt Lake City. Sitting next to his attorney, he leaned forward, listening intently and sometimes scrunching his face as Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Lunnen argued for a gag order.
One of Johnson's new attorneys, Earl Xaiz, assured the magistrate that Johnson will no longer be trying the case in the media. He also pointed out that Johnson has stopped making public comments since he switched attorneys in early February. In a hearing in February, Johnson told Warner he was finished talking.
"From that standpoint, I'm not sure we need an order," Xaiz said.
Warner said he's pleased with the recent behavior by Johnson, noting a "dramatic change," but said a gag order is still prudent. He said defendants have a right to maintain their innocence, but that casting aspersions upon people is not appropriate.
Xaiz didn't object to working with the U.S. attorney's office on the gag order.
Xaiz and his partner, Ronald Yengich, are new to the case. Johnson lost four other lawyers who quit the case earlier this year for reasons they explained only to a magistrate in private.
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet, passes away
- XanGo co-founder accuses partners of...
- Mia Love announces she's officially running...
- Fly a flag for Cody: Army confirms Utah man...
- GOP delegates reject changes to nominating...
- Mitt Romney to live in Utah — at least...
- Airport TRAX ridership remains strong weeks...
- Early diagnosis may be key in slowing...
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet,...
65 - Mitt Romney to live in Utah — at...
46 - GOP delegates reject changes to...
27 - Mia Love announces she's officially...
27 - Utah GOP convention agenda includes...
20 - Angry Orrin Hatch: IRS guilty of...
19 - Mormon missionary age announcement...
15 - Swallow headlines spark question:...
12



This is way over the top. Way over the top.
The First Amendment to the Constitution specifically states "Congress shall make no law...; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to More..