Jeffrey D. Allred, Deseret News
Sen. Orrin Hatch likes to say he doesn't usually vote against cloture on nominees and never on judicial nominees — that is, that he doesn't support the filibuster of nominees by preventing an up-or-down confirmation vote in the full Senate.
He recently voted to continue the filibuster of President Obama's nominee for defense secretary, Chuck Hagel, and he routinely does so to block the president's judicial nominees. However, instead of voting "no" on cloture votes (votes on whether or not to end debate and let a nominee or bill proceed to a majority vote), he is frequently the lone senator voting "present." His dishonesty lies in the fact that with cloture votes, 60 "yes" votes are required to proceed — so voting "present," or really anything but "yes," is the same exact thing as voting "no."
I hope that as his constituents become increasingly educated about this charade, more and more of them will be calling him out and letting him know that they are noticing and he's not fooling them. It's time for Hatch to be upfront about his filibustering of the president's nominees, instead of hiding behind the gimmick of voting "present."
Salt Lake City
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act needs...
- Doug Robinson: Violence against women is...
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'?
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- My view: Balancing personal conviction and...
- My view: Powdr Corp and Park City Mountain...
- The relationship between religiosity and...
- Improving voter turnout still a tough nut to...
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 114
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 74
- My view: Balancing personal conviction... 53
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Letter: Policy disagreement 45
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 39
- My view: A global warming solution to... 36
- Join the discussion: Is it impossible... 32