Attorney General Eric Holder promises more openness on national security
Attorney General Eric Holder pauses as he testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 6, 2013, before the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing: "Oversight of the U.S. Department of Justice." Holder urged Congress to confront gun violence by requiring universal background checks, imposing tougher penalties on traffickers and banning high-capacity magazines and military-style assault weapons.
Evan Vucci, Associated Press
WASHINGTON — Attorney General Eric Holder promised the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that the Obama administration will share more information with Congress and the American people about national security policies, particularly the government's use of drone strikes.
Holder's comments came at a hearing where both Democratic and Republican senators said they must have access to Justice Department memoranda that form the legal underpinning for precisely when the administration can use drone strikes to kill a suspected terrorist, even if the person is a U.S. citizen.
Committee chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said the judiciary panel should have the legal opinions, some of which were provided recently to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and the Senate Intelligence Committee, which she chairs.
"I heard you and the president has heard you," Holder said. The attorney general said he is confident that if the public had more information there would be greater comfort that the administration is acting in conformity with the law.
Without elaborating, Holder said a number of steps are going to be taken and that he expects "the president will be talking about this."
Fueling the senators' questions was a March 4 letter that Holder wrote to Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who asked whether, in the administration's view, the president has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil.
In his letter, the attorney general said the president could conceivably have no choice but to authorize the military use of such force in circumstances of a catastrophic attack like the ones suffered at Pearl Harbor and on Sept. 11, 2001.
But Holder emphasized that administration has no intention of carrying out drone strikes in the United States. Holder said Rand's hypothetical is unlikely "and one we hope no president will ever have to confront."
On another topic, Holder urged Congress to confront gun violence by requiring universal background checks, imposing tougher penalties on traffickers and banning high-capacity magazines and military-style assault weapons.
Holder said Congress should eliminate what he called misguided restrictions requiring federal agents to allow older weapons to be imported into the United States.
The attorney general also urged senators to confirm a new director for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. The agency has been without a Senate-confirmed leader for six years. ATF has been mired in a long-running controversy stemming from a botched gun smuggling investigation in Arizona. ATF agents lost track of about 1,400 of more than 2,000 illicitly acquired weapons in the operation.
- Gallup poll shows shift in views on morality...
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
- Affordable Care Act could bring 'skinny'...
- Boy Scouts open membership to all boys,...
- Mistake or miracle: New evidence on the...
- Wash. I-5 bridge collapse caused by oversize...
- Mothers on meth: New book highlights family...
- One third of millenials regret going to college
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
64 - Boy Scouts open membership to all boys,...
44 - Journalists criticize Obama...
38 - IRS official Lerner invokes Fifth...
22 - Former IRS chief to Congress: Can't say...
21 - Gallup poll shows shift in views on...
20 - More Obama aides knew IRS targeted...
19 - US companies challenging contraception...
19



@Mountanman--are talking of Eric, or Barry?
Laughable! Eric, you have NO credibility whatsoever! Why? Fast and furious among other things. In other words, your word is no good!