Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Should we be angry about this sequestration business?
Alex Brandon, Associated Press
The dreaded sequestration budget cuts are happening.
Should we be angry at the Utah congressional delegation for not doing more to avoid sequestration?
Pignanelli: "Congress: Bingo with billions." — Red Skelton
An unscientific but interesting method to measure Congress and its individual members is to compare them with teenagers. Individually, adolescents can be moody, non-communicative, frustrating; but often times can be smart, charming and fun. When two or more pre-adults gather, the real trouble begins. Within a short period of time every indicator of human civilization plummets: the collective IQ of the group, respect for others, any shred of common sense. A visit to a shopping mall verifies this behavior.
Our nation's capital is akin to a conference of teenagers, especially in which a herd mentality diminishes otherwise sophisticated humans. As separate people, our delegation is intelligent, respectable and legitimately concerned with the direction of the country. Unfortunately, the rhetoric from the respective caucuses (and the administration) is perceived as clueless partisan sniping (much like teenagers). The game of chicken over sequestration is also viewed as a dangerous exhibition of bravado (very much like teenagers). It is impossible to pin the blame of the sequestration mess on any one lawmaker — or the president. Thus, Americans continue to support their local members of Congress but disparage the government as a whole. It is not logical, but neither are teenagers.
Webb: We should congratulate our federal lawmakers for calling the Obama administration's bluff. I really hate that our national government lurches from crisis to crisis, but I don't want Congress to give in to Obama's demand for higher taxes, more government spending and unwillingness to responsibly address entitlements. So we're in for more stalemate and dysfunction.
If Congress and the president actually could reach a big, comprehensive "grand bargain" compromise, one that properly addresses entitlements, puts spending on a 10-year downward trajectory, and encompasses pro-growth tax reform, I'd say go for it in a heartbeat; even if higher taxes through closing loopholes are part of the deal. But as long as Obama demands higher taxes with little spending restraint, Utah's congressmen must stand firm.
Will the cuts be as bad as the Obama administration has portrayed?
Pignanelli: Starting this weekend, Americans will wonder what the fuss was all about. Yet, when summer vacation begins and the lines to enter national parks and airport security are miles in length, the harping will increase. Over time other impacts — especially in schools — will garner media attention and increase the heat. Congressional Republicans have failed in their messaging and will suffer the greater recriminations.
Webb: Just think, soon we'll be able to buy a bumper sticker that says, "I survived the great 2013 budget sequester." Our grandchildren will gaze at us in awe 10 years from now as we sit around a campfire and describe how we made do with 2 percent less in the federal budget.
We will regale the youngsters with tales of airplanes falling from the sky, of teachers getting fired, of terrorists infiltrating the country and buildings going up in flames, as promised by the Obama administration, all because we cut 2 percent out of the federal budget.
This debate shows how hard it is for Congress to get even a bit of control over federal spending. Washington is borrowing $4 of every $10 it spends, with no end in sight, but Obama and the Democrats are unwilling to cut even modest amounts.
Families can cut. Businesses can cut. States can cut. Local governments can cut. But the federal government can't cut without anguished cries that the sky is falling.
Does the tea party still control Republican policy in Congress?
- Can you pass the U.S. citizenship test?
- W. Bradford Wilcox: The new progressive...
- In our opinion: Don't 'Army-ize' local police...
- John Hoffmire: To feed the world, we must...
- Letter: Singles solution
- Charles Krauthammer: The jihadi logic
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Are...
- Letter: Protect public lands
- My view: Utah, where do you stand on... 96
- W. Bradford Wilcox: The new progressive... 43
- Letter: Bush dilemma 2.0 42
- In our opinion: Don't 'Army-ize' local... 28
- George F. Will: Obama needs Congress to... 27
- Can you pass the U.S. citizenship test? 27
- In our opinion: How committed are... 26
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Are... 21