The massive news coverage of John Swallow's alleged improprieties illustrates the liberal media's biased coverage of conservative politicians. For example, consider the 39 days of front page coverage the New York Times gave the Abu Ghraib prisoner humiliation vs. the minimization of the Obama administration's negligence and cover-up of the murder of four Americans, including Ambassador Stevens, in Benghazi.
Another is Obama's "corpse" men speech, where he repeatedly mispronounced the military term "corp," which was virtually ignored by the media. Contrast this with Sen. Marco Rubio's drink of water which was endlessly replayed on network and cable news.
Swallow's activities are very mild in the spectrum of daily behind-the-scenes political dealings, but he was fingered because of his aggressive defense of Utah's public lands. The political environmentalists and their partners in the media couldn't let him get away with that.
If the media is going to do some political witch-hunting, it should do so on an equal opportunity basis — there is plenty to go around.
Rainer Huck
Salt Lake City
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation of...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: How will...
- My view: One woman's story of redemption...
- Dan Liljenquist: Chaffetz's search for truth...
- In our opinion: Frances B. Monson's...
- George F. Will: President Obama's new...
- Charles Krauthammer: Americans deserve the...
- Letter: Labeling all exotic animals as...




Quite the rant.
Lets go one by one.
First, can you outline who is (or who is not) the Liberal media? That would give us a starting point.
As far as the "The massive news coverage of John Swallow's alleged More..
Yeah, the local media in Utah is sooooooo liberal...
Hear that, DesNews? You hear that, all you Utah Republicans who think Swallow's corruption is an embarrassment to the state?
You're all just a bunch of gol'durned biased libruls!
"Swallow's activities More..