Beware the hidden head tax. Rep. Joel Briscoe, D-Salt Lake, has sponsored a virtual head tax on Utah parents in order to raise money for our schools. It is part of HB55, "Amendments Related to Education Funding." The problem is that as time passes it hits families raising children with proportionately higher taxes than the rest of us. The proposal locks Utah's personal exemption at $2,850, the same as under current Utah law. (Our current code uses 75 percent of the federal exemption.) Next year the federal exemption will go up, but under this law our state exemption would stay locked at $2,850.
Seductive, isn't it? Every year less money is protected from taxation. Every year more money goes to the schools. Some next year, then more and more each following year. But proportionately more and more will come from parents. Single with no kids? A little more. Family? Even more. The more kids the more the increase. Care for disabled parents? Yes, yet more. Briscoe is clever. But does Utah really want this virtual, creeping head tax?
John C. Clark
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- Dan Liljenquist: The economic impact of...
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the...
- In our opinion: Federal contracting executive...
- Perceptions of Obama and his policies at home...
- My view: Utah's Constitution requires state...
- Capitalism and the common good: Fairness,...
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'?
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 114
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 79
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 47
- Join the discussion: Is feminism... 38
- Capitalism and the common good:... 37
- My view: A global warming solution to... 36
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the... 36