Mark Humphrey, Associated Press
With much being said about women in direct combat, it was refreshing to read Kathleen Parker's view, because she dared to offer a dissenting voice against the phony world of political correctness ("Who has courage to point out problems with women in combat?", Feb. 5). She reminds us that while "some women are more fit than some men... it is also true that most aren't as capable of becoming as strong as most men." This is not a matter of who spends more time at the gym — it is just an honest recognition of human nature.
The current combat issue being debated in Washington might be compared to the world of professional sports. For example, why is it that we do not find women competing alongside men in the NBA or NFL? Very simple. The purpose and objective of these leagues is to win games, not merely to give everyone and anyone the right to be included. It is sad to see that because of misguided leadership in our great nation, the purpose and objective of our military is shifting from the will to win on the battlefield to a desire to grant civil liberties to everyone and anyone.
- Doug Robinson: The high cost of coaches
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Long-term...
- In our opinion: Liberal arts vs STEM...
- My view: History reveals some correct beliefs...
- Drew Clark: After 50 years, Moore's Law...
- In our opinion: Fabricated Rolling Stone...
- Letter: Next president?
- Letter: Costly benefits
- Ralph Hancock: Religious freedom and... 75
- Letter: Wrong wage approach 47
- Letter: No more hungry kids 41
- Kathleen Parker: Hillary Clinton's... 40
- Greg Bell: The problem of being a... 40
- Utah's 'grand bargain' stands in sharp... 34
- Letter: Unemployment compensation 33
- Letter: Intimate caucus system 27