Should Obama press for more energy exploration?
Yes: We must remove the barriers on utilizing domestic resources; No: U.S. can jump-start economy by taking lead in green technology
Workers move a section of casing into place at a natural gas well near Burlington, Pa.
Associated Press
Yes: We must remove the barriers on utilizing domestic resources
WASHINGTON — Can increasing American energy exploration improve our economy? Yes, but more to the point, it's already happening.
Energy — and the jobs and growth it will drive — is the foundation for our economic recovery.
Our nation is blessed with some of the most abundant energy resources on Earth. Thanks in large part to the technology-driven shale boom, we have enough natural gas to power America for 120 years.
We also have at least 200 years of oil under our lands and off our shores and more than 250 years of coal. And that's just what we can recover with today's technology. With continued advancements, we will be able to access even greater domestic supplies in the future.
Our stagnant economy craves investment, and our nation's energy resources are a true economic engine of recovery.
According to a report sponsored by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Energy Institute and conducted by IHS, shale oil and natural gas development alone contributed $238 billion to our economy in 2012, and investments in shale reached $87 billion.
Shale development is also on track to generate more than $2.5 trillion in government revenues by 2035 — including $62 billion in 2012. As our nation's leaders look for revenue to drive down our high deficits, they must consider the significant contribution energy can make.
Energy spurs job creation in every state, and there's opportunities for much more. The IHS report found that shale activity has already created 1.75 million jobs over the past several years, with an additional 1.25 million coming by 2020. Beyond shale, an additional 86,000 jobs could be created by 2020 by building the Keystone XL Pipeline, according to a Canadian Energy Research Institute study.
Our nation can't afford not to move forward with oil and gas development. While job growth in the oil and gas industry has expanded by 38.6 percent since 2007, non-farm employment has contracted by 2.6 percent in the period. The unemployment rate would be in the double digits were it not for the oil and gas industry.
Energy can also help sharpen America's competitive edge in the global economy and improve our national security.
Thanks to our vast natural gas resources, electricity costs are falling and helping revitalize manufacturing in the United States. Industries are returning, plants are reopening and even some foreign manufacturers are diverting investments and operations to America, where low energy costs are becoming very appealing.
We can reduce the amount of oil we import, saving $200 billion a year, and become a more active player in global energy markets by exporting natural gas and coal. But we can't take this renaissance for granted. Industry needs a predictable and fair regulatory environment. Too often the federal government subjects energy projects to endless and duplicative reviews.
Such roadblocks have stymied vital energy projects that create jobs and revitalize communities. There needs to be a gut check on the number of regulations that are strangling so many of our energy resources.
We know that a competitive, 21st century energy strategy cannot focus only on oil, gas and coal. Nuclear energy should play a more significant role in providing us with clean, emissions-free energy through the next generation of nuclear power plants. Renewable sources like wind, solar, geothermal and hydropower all have an important role to play.
Energy presents the biggest opportunity to build a stronger foundation and a brighter future for our country. The 21st century has brought America an era of energy abundance. Let's make the most of it for the sake our economy, competitiveness and national security.
- White House press corps has been turned into...
- George F. Will: Obama takes a page from...
- My view: MMR vaccine caused my son's autism
- Facts about the Boy Scouts of America
- In our opinion: Sharing ideas across schools...
- My view: Fighting the ignoble reign of money
- Letters: Bennett is right
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- Letters: Move to the center
37 - Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
34 - My view: Why moderates lost the caucus...
33 - Dan Liljenquist: IRS scandal is an...
32 - Richard Davis: Abortion laws should...
29 - Letters: Dismantle IRS
25 - Robert J. Samuelson: Can Americans stem...
21 - Letters: The buck stops here
21



We can, and should, do both. Our petrochemical abundance really isn't that abundant, and it's certainly not limitless. It will take years to make green technology viable, and we are going to need petroleum based resources until then. Drill, More..
"Should Obama press for more energy exploration?"
Obama should stay the heck out of it. Decisions to produce more energy is/should be a private business concern. The government is putting itself into businesses where it More..
Alfred said:
"Should Obama press for more energy exploration?"
Obama should stay the heck out of it.
Or should he? The government gives welfare checks to the big oilly companies who are reporting record profits.
But More..