You recently printed a letter from Michael Robinson in which he argues for the adoption of an ethics law for Utah's attorneys ("It's time for an attorney ethics law," Feb. 8). Robinson's letter contains both inaccuracies and fabrications. Frankly, your readers deserve better.
Robinson references and quotes from the "Utah Judicial Conduct Code." The problem? There is no such thing. The Utah "Code of Judicial Conduct" is adopted by the Utah Supreme Court and governs the on-bench and off-bench behavior of Utah's judges. It does not govern the behavior of attorneys, and it does not contain the quotation ascribed by Robinson.
Robinson claims that the Utah Judicial Conduct Commission "doesn't enforce its code." To the contrary, the commission actively investigates and resolves nearly 100 complaints each year. When appropriate, the commission recommends that the Utah Supreme Court sanction judges who have behaved unethically.
Robinson claims that commission staff "admits the commission has little disciplinary power." To my knowledge, no one on the commission's staff has ever spoken with Robinson. However, it is true that the commission has no disciplinary power over attorneys. The behavior of Utah's attorneys is governed by the Rules of Professional Conduct, also adopted by the Utah Supreme Court. The Utah State Bar's Office of Professional Conduct — not the Judicial Conduct Commission — investigates and prosecutes allegations of misconduct by attorneys.
Readers who desire an accurate description of the commission's work are invited to review the commission's web site at www.jcc.utah.gov or call the commission office at 801-626-3369 and actually speak with a staff member.
Colin R. Winchester, Executive Director of Utah Judicial Conduct Commission
- In our opinion: Marriage definition on...
- About Utah: Big-time golf in little ol'...
- Drew Clark: Can the Supreme Court find...
- Peter Corroon: Generalizations about liberals...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: We can't help...
- Letter: No oversight at all
- Letter: Climate change is unjustified rhetoric
- A. Scott Anderson: Overregulation hurts bank...
- In our opinion: Marriage definition on... 88
- Richard Davis: A historic moment for... 60
- Jay Evensen: U.S. silence troubling... 59
- Letter: Climate change is unjustified... 42
- Peter Corroon: Generalizations about... 37
- Letter: We can do better 27
- A. Scott Anderson: Overregulation hurts... 26
- In our opinion: Recent drowning of 800... 22