The world is an increasingly secular one in which opinion leaders often treat religion with disdain. People of faith are told their notions of God and morality aren't fit companions for modernity. Calls come from every quarter for churches to compromise, to give in, to "get with the times."
Pope Benedict XVI failed to heed those calls, and the world is a better place as a result.
When Pope Benedict XVI took office in 2005, many critics insisted that he was ill-suited to stand at the head of a 21st century church. They were hoping for a pontiff who would not be tied to the moral foundations of the Judeo-Christian tradition, of which the Roman Catholic Church has been so integral. Thankfully, they wouldn't find such a man in the former Cardinal Josef Ratzinger, who announced his resignation from the papacy on Monday. Pope Benedict proved to be a leader of unwavering integrity and commitment who refused to retreat from the tenets of the faith he was chosen to lead.
In one of his first addresses after assuming office, the pope decried the shifting moral standards that characterize the current spiritual environment. "Today, a particularly insidious obstacle to the task of education is the massive presence in our society and culture of that relativism, which, recognizing nothing as definitive, leaves as the ultimate criterion only the self with its desires," he said. "And under the semblance of freedom it becomes a prison for each one, for it separates people from one another, locking each person into his or her own ego."
Pope Benedict XVI has been a tireless advocate for the idea that moral principles remain constant, and that personal fealty to those principles and faith in God are more relevant today than they ever have been. He has written extensively about these concepts with both clarity and power. Indeed, the current pontiff has been credited as being one of the most thoughtful and adept theologians ever to hold the office.
That is not say, however, that Pope Benedict is either inflexible or unteachable. His ecumenical efforts have drawn praise from many who do not share his faith, and his outreach to Judaism and the Eastern Orthodox Church demonstrated a genuine willingness to listen and to adapt. In every circumstance, he has been a man who has fully dedicated his life to the improvement of the human condition.
We wish him well in his retirement. He will be sorely missed.
- Letter: Social judges?
- Kathleen Parker: Baltimore riots —...
- In our opinion: Revisiting the Holocaust as...
- Sen. Orrin Hatch: Misrepresentation against...
- Jay Evensen: Face it Salt Lake, panhandlers...
- Letter: No cash deposits
- Navas & Archibald: Utah has already paid its...
- Dean Li: Don’t stop debating merits of...
- Sen. Orrin Hatch: Misrepresentation... 71
- John Hoffmire: The pathway to change in... 49
- In our opinion: Greece's fiscal... 34
- In our opinion: Regulatory relief,... 33
- Letter: No humane way to kill 30
- Michael Erickson: Lincoln saved a... 27
- Dean Li: Don’t stop debating... 26
- Letter: No cash deposits 23