Stuart Johnson, Deseret News
I respectfully disagree with David Rasmussen's assumptions that Utah land transfers from the federal government to the state of Utah would be a financial disaster for the state of Utah based upon some 1969 thinking ("Sale of public lands," Feb. 1). Rasmussen seems to forget that Utah is the very best fiscally managed state in the entire country. We are also the lowest-cost state in the delivery of health care and we would be a lot better off educationally if those lands were returned to the state of Utah.
Utahns are not about to mismanage public lands. We appreciate the outdoors too much. Bar none, this is the greatest state on the planet, run by fiscally and environmentally responsible elected officials, which is more than I can say about the federal morass we have today. We are fiercely independent and don't need transplanted Easterners nor Eastern-based congressmen dictating how our lands are managed.
- Jay Evensen: Ask people in the Third World if...
- My view: Medical marijuana: Google vs. PubMed
- My view: Why so many Americans find Trump and...
- George F. Will: Break the dentists' hold on...
- In our opinion: Alleged medicinal benefits of...
- Rely on invisible hand?
- My view: Does going to pot send the wrong...
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe?
- In our opinion: National security and... 79
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms... 58
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe? 39
- Barack Obama: Religious freedom keeps... 34
- Jay Evensen: Legislature's pornography... 32
- In our opinion: Alleged medicinal... 32
- Letter: Coal and job creation 24
- Rely on invisible hand? 24