DOJ memo reignites debate over use of drones against terrorists, U.S. citizens
An unmanned U.S. Predator drone flies over Kandahar Air Field, southern Afghanistan, on a moon-lit night.
Associated Press
WASHINGTON — Uncomfortable with the Obama administration's use of deadly drones, a growing number in Congress is looking to limit America's authority to kill suspected terrorists, even U.S. citizens.
The Democratic-led outcry was emboldened by the revelation in a newly surfaced Justice Department memo that shows drones can strike against a wider range of threats, with less evidence, than previously believed.
The drone program, which has been used from Pakistan across the Middle East and into North Africa to find and kill an unknown number of suspected terrorists, is expected to be a top topic of debate when the Senate Intelligence Committee grills John Brennan, the White House's pick for CIA chief, at a hearing Thursday.
The White House on Tuesday defended its lethal drone program by citing the very laws that some in Congress once believed were appropriate in the years immediately after the Sept. 11 attacks but now think may be too broad.
"It has to be in the agenda of this Congress to reconsider the scope of action of drones and use of deadly force by the United States around the world because the original authorization of use of force, I think, is being strained to its limits," Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., said.
Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the No. 2 Democrat in the House, said Tuesday that "it deserves a serious look at how we make the decisions in government to take out, kill, eliminate, whatever word you want to use, not just American citizens but other citizens as well. ... We ought to carefully review our policies as a country."
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee likely will hold hearings on U.S. drone policy, an aide said Tuesday, and Chairman Robert Menendez, D-N.J., and the panel's top Republican, Sen. Bob Corker, both have quietly expressed concerns about the deadly operations.
- Washington Post writer: Mitt Romney lost...
- Colorado Mormons join other faiths in...
- Pew study: News media inserted bias into gay...
- Video: Miss Utah USA flubs answer at Miss USA...
- NPR writer 'slightly' defends Miss Utah USA's...
- Parents rally after Canadian elementary...
- Cap'n Crunch refutes claims he's not actually...
- Facebook goes down, users flood Twitter
- Pew study: News media inserted bias...
51 - Video: Miss Utah USA flubs answer at...
26 - Parents rally after Canadian elementary...
23 - New York English teacher assigns...
16 - Washington Post writer: Mitt Romney...
16 - Officials: NSA programs broke terrorist...
15 - IRS official: Washington scrutinized...
15 - NSA director says surveillance programs...
14



...against all enemies - Foreign and Domestic.
so, if you don't like it, change the Constitution.
This is war against those that participate in terrorism isn't it?
The laws of war are different than laws during non war time aren't they.
If someone is waging war against a country, it shouldn't matter their
These people -- who have made a decision to wage terrorism against us -- are no different than Mr. Dykes in Alabama who waged a war of terrorism against a bus driver and small boy.
If they cannot be arrested without risk to other More..