Ferrandino acknowledged that the proposals "we introduce today will not bring all gun violence to a screeching halt," but insisted the plans would reduce shootings.
Republicans argued that what Democrats are proposing would not have prevented any of the recent mass shootings and that universal background checks are unenforceable without a registry of all firearms.
"The extreme liberal wing of the ruling class would rather make us criminals, than allow us to protect our families from criminals," said Sen. Bill Cadman, the Republican's Senate leader.
Bill Hoover, 83, whose grandson AJ Boik was among those killed in Aurora, said he supports the idea of more background checks and new liability standards. He said he believes stricter background checks would have made it more difficult for the Aurora shooter to get his firearms.
"The background check portion of it, AJ would still be alive, I believe," he said, holding a picture of Boik to his chest. "I firmly believe that."
Find Ivan Moreno and Kristen Wyatt on Twitter: http://twitter.com/IvanJourno and http://twitter.com/APkristenwyatt
- LDS missionary 'stable' following hit-and-run...
- Steven Powell will not be released from...
- Mitt Romney talks IRS, AP records, Benghazi...
- Jury in Arias trial brought to tears by...
- Newtown parents seek more focus on security
- Treasury IG says Obama administration...
- One month later: Boston Marathon victims...
- House chairman sees IRS targeting as part of...
- 'Unprecedented': Obama administration...
27 - Attorney General Eric Holder says he...
21 - Journalists push back against Obama...
21 - Angry Orrin Hatch: IRS guilty of...
19 - Obama slams IRS targeting, defends...
18 - LDS missionary 'stable' following...
17 - IRS lacked 'sensitivity' in screenings...
16 - House chairman sees IRS targeting as...
16



Will they hold BO and Holder responsible for all the Mexicans killed by fast and furious guns?
How about Toyota every time someone dies when a Toyota gets in a wreck?
Non Here,
The difference is that we as a society tend to absolve the drinker of responsibility for his actions while drunk. The blame for his actions then shifts to the only other person who could have prevented the condition and was in More..
I my self see nothing wrong wiith what there doing. You go to a bar get drunk and the bar tender keeps on selling you drinks and you get in a wreck, they can charge him and the bar, so whats the big deal? Oh and i do own guns.