This Jan. 31, 2013 photo provided by the Japan Transport Safety Board shows two of eight damaged cells in the battery, that overheated on the All Nippon Airways Boeing 787 on Jan. 16 and prompted an emergency landing, during an investigation by U.S. and Japanese aviation safety regulators at its manufacturer GS Yuasa's headquarters in Kyoto, Japan. An investigation into the battery found evidence of the same type of "thermal runaway" seen in a similar incident in Boston, officials said Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013.
Japan Transport Safety Board) EDITORIAL USE ONLY, NO SALES, Associated Press
TOKYO — An investigation into a lithium ion battery that overheated on a Boeing 787 flight in Japan last month found evidence of the same type of "thermal runaway" seen in a similar incident in Boston, officials said Tuesday.
The Japan Transportation Safety Board said that CAT scans and other analysis found damage to all eight cells in the battery that overheated on the All Nippon Airways 787 on Jan. 16, which prompted an emergency landing and probes by both U.S. and Japanese aviation safety regulators.
They also found signs of short-circuiting and "thermal runaway," a chemical reaction in which rising temperature causes progressively hotter temperatures. U.S. investigators found similar evidence in the battery that caught fire last month on a Japan Airlines 787 parked in Boston.
Photos distributed by the Japanese investigators show severe charring of six of the eight cells in the ANA 787's battery and a frayed and broken earthing wire — meant to minimize the risk of electric shock.
All 50 Boeing 787s in operation are grounded as regulators and Boeing investigate the problem. The Japanese probe is focusing on flight data records and on the charger and other electrical systems connected to the damaged battery.
Lithium ion batteries are more susceptible to catching fire when they overheat or to short-circuit than other types of batteries. Boeing built in safeguards to gain safety certification for use of the relatively light and powerful batteries to power various electrical systems on the 787, the world's first airliner made mostly from lightweight composite materials.
Investigators earlier said they found no evidence of quality problems with production of the 787's batteries by Kyoto, Japan-based, GS Yuasa, whose own aerospace ambitions are on the line.
Yuasa said Tuesday that its April-December net profit fell 3.6 percent to 5.5 billion yuan ($59.6 million) from a year earlier, as demand for batteries lagged due to sluggish demand in Japan and overseas.
The company has struggled to turn its lithium ion business to profitability. In April-December its lithium ion business posted a 7.2 billion yen ($78.2 million) loss, it said, compared with an operating loss of 3.26 billion yen in the full-year that ended March 31, 2012.
- Abercrombie & Fitch CEO posts statement on...
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
- Boy Scouts change policy to open membership...
- Brave woman tried to reason with London...
- Tornado relief spurs LDS Church, Layton's...
- One third of millenials regret going to college
- Facts about the Boy Scouts of America
- Salt Lake City ranked the 14th healthiest...
- Mitt Romney talks IRS, AP records,...
66 - Journalists criticize Obama...
38 - Defending the Faith: A case for the...
37 - Associated Press CEO calls records...
23 - White House insists Obama was not...
22 - IRS official Lerner invokes Fifth...
22 - Former IRS chief to Congress: Can't say...
21 - More Obama aides knew IRS targeted...
19



The real problem with the Boeing 787 -- everything was outsourced.
Lithium Ion batteries are known to have thermal runaway. Given this, and given that this is an airplane where hundreds of lives are at stake, I am wondering why this kind of battery was used.
Here is a possible fix,
impliment a system to monitor the temperature of the battery which will cool the bettery in the event of thermal runaway.
or
make the battery so that it is in several pieces, each separated More..