We all are very concerned with the yearly winter inversions and the pollution they trap. I have a simple, inexpensive way to immediately reduce a large source of pollution in the Salt Lake area.
A few years ago, 700 East north of 2100 South was re-striped to eliminate a traffic lane and add a bike lane. Vehicle traffic, which used to flow efficiently, is now sluggish. My husband's commute now takes five additional minutes, all of which are spent in a short section of 700 East. It takes two cycles of lights to even cross those intersections.
I can't imagine that the pollution saved by a very few summer bicyclists compensates for the idling of thousands of cars twice a day. A common sense solution would be to funnel the bike lanes to 500 or 900 East and return the fourth traffic lane. This seems like a win-win solution based in reality.
Cars will travel more efficiently, and drastically cut down on pollution while cyclists will travel on quieter roads, breathing less pollution themselves! Since 700 East accommodated four lanes of traffic for decades, a simple re-striping will return it to the efficient and less polluting roadway it once was.
Salt Lake City
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- Dan Liljenquist: The economic impact of...
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the...
- In our opinion: Federal contracting executive...
- My view: Utah's Constitution requires state...
- Perceptions of Obama and his policies at home...
- Capitalism and the common good: Fairness,...
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'?
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 114
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 79
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 47
- Join the discussion: Is feminism... 38
- Capitalism and the common good:... 37
- My view: A global warming solution to... 36
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the... 36