A recent Deseret News editorial reserves judgment on John Swallow, who, as deputy attorney general, may have facilitated some type of lobbying effort on behalf of a friend in trouble ("Jumping to conclusions," Jan. 17).
The "common sense" suggests that lobbying is "legal and expensive," but how exactly does one lobby a law enforcement body? Also, beyond the legalities as to whether Swallow's transgressions reach the felonious levels of former Utah party chair and congresswoman Enid Greene Mickelsen, why should I have any confidence in our new AG's judgment and propriety?
Absolute power may be convenient, but it is invariably corrupt.
Ken Shaw
Salt Lake City
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- My view: UDOT listened, made a good choice
- Letters: Move to the center
- Richard Davis: Abortion laws should keep up...
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- In our opinion: Susan Cox Powell's case is...
- Timothy R. Clark: Real job creation requires...
- Letters: Disaster vs. disease
- Comprehensive immigration reform or bust
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letters: No welfare, ever
73 - My view: Why moderates lost the caucus...
33 - Letters: Move to the center
31 - Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
31 - In our opinion: Big screen exploitation...
27 - Richard Davis: Abortion laws should...
26 - Robert J. Samuelson: Can Americans stem...
21 - Letters: The buck stops here
18




If John Swallow is actually innocent, he should voluntarily step aside while a thorough, completely independent and open investigation is conducted.
A police officer is placed on administrative leave following an incident. Shouldn't More..
We need to root out corruption. Swallow needs to go. Why is he being given such special treatment?
Real Maverick -- are you trying to be funny or do you really not know the answer to that question?
(Just kidding -- I know you know. And thank you for constantly standing up for common sense here.)