Armstrong is not sorry for what he did, just that he got caught
Even when all this is properly executed, do we really trust the penitent? Or is it simply a requisite ritual?
Armstrong, though he accepted Oprah's invitation, declined our kind invitation to fall to his knees. Nor did he ask for pity — or offer excuses or names. He refused to play snitch and, apparently, has no well-crafted strategy for redemption. He's simply saying he did it.
Perhaps it is a mistake to judge a person's sincerity by affect. We all grieve in different ways; perhaps, too, we experience guilt and shame in our own way.
Stripped of his seven Tour de France titles, his Olympic medal, ousted by the foundation he created and facing multiple lawsuits, Armstrong has fallen just about as far as one can. It seems enough.
Kathleen Parker's email address is kathleenparker@washpost.com.
comment
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation of...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: How will...
- My view: One woman's story of redemption...
- George F. Will: President Obama's new...
- Dan Liljenquist: Chaffetz's search for truth...
- Charles Krauthammer: Americans deserve the...
- Letter: Labeling all exotic animals as...
- In our opinion: Frances B. Monson's...



Armstrong comes across to me as really arrogant.
I still like Armstrong. People push themselves to the very limit. To ride a bike for as long and as fast as Lance Armstrong did is impressive. I personally don't care that he used "performance enhancing drugs." Its his body and his More..
You mean like 99% of every other competetive sports athelte.
When winning means everything --
or like how Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton, and General Petraeus were only sorry after they got caught?