As a survivor of being taken hostage by a man with a gun, I would like to voice my opinion on the subject of arming teachers in our classrooms as an effective solution to dealing with potential assault by someone armed with a weapon.
Based on first-hand experience, I have no doubt the man who told me if I looked at him he would "blow me away" had done so in the past and was prepared to do so again. I am alive today, but the person the gunman referred to — a female FBI agent, armed and trained to defend herself — is not. The reason: I was defenseless.
I believe that weapons invite violence. There are alternative solutions to being confronted by a gun. I applaud the training being offered to teachers that does not include carrying a weapon in the classroom and encourages creative ways of successfully protecting children in their care.
Again—I am here today because I was defenseless in that I did not carry a weapon. As terrified as I was, I did not hesitate to look him in the eye and tell him I was not afraid. I was able to engage him in conversation and appeal to his sense of compassion.
I beg you to reconsider how to deal with the issue of gun violence. More guns are not the answer.
- My view: History lesson — 'Taking back'...
- In our opinion: Boy Scouts of America and...
- In our opinion: With caucus compromise, Utah...
- John Florez: Education — Big government...
- Letter: A 'dying' document
- In our opinion: Prison relocation iffy
- Letter: Religious freedom
- Was Hillary right to compare Putin to Hitler?
- Letter: Minimum Wage insufficient 67
- Has Obama's foreign policy emboldened... 62
- Jay Evensen: Obama could use a dose of... 60
- Letter: Religious freedom 53
- In our opinion: Boy Scouts of America... 32
- Sen. Ted Cruz opens 2014 CPAC with... 30
- Was Hillary right to compare Putin to... 30
- Senate defeats Obama in Justice nod 21