One of the arguments against raising the tax rate on the top bracket is that the very rich will claim their citizenship to be of another country that offers a lower tax rate. The reasoning is that the U.S. will end up with less dollar revenue after the tax rate is raised than at the current rate. Should we pity them because they will be able to afford merely a 40-foot yacht instead of a 44-footer?
I am a World War II veteran and have flown 35 missions over Germany as a lower ball turret gunner on a B-17 bomber. I receive a disability pension of $129 per month. I'll bet I could talk some of my buddies into going in with me and contributing our earned pension money.
Then, perhaps one person could afford their 44-foot yacht and choose to stay as an American citizen.
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet
- School fees: Is Utah really family friendly?
- Jay Evensen: Utahns support Common Core, even...
- 20 of the most influential and innovative...
- Charles Krauthammer: Solution to inversion is...
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse tends to...
- Michael Gerson: State of Israel: History...
- Carmen Rasmusen Herbert: Lessons learned from...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb:... 82
- Letter: Police brutality 62
- School fees: Is Utah really family... 48
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse... 43
- Richard Davis: The State Board can do... 42
- Constitutional commitments trump tribal... 35
- Join the discussion: Is Common Core... 29
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet 29